Jeg ønsker, at forbedre min engelsk sprog skriftligt, og har derfor brug for jeres hjælp. I skal nemlige rette den for stavefejl,grammatik, tekstforståelse og alt andet i kan komme i tanker om :)

Jeg har skrevet en kort referat hvor jeg tager udgangspunkt i følgende nyheds artikel

http://tribune.com.pk/story/406300/nawaz-sharif-imran-khan-assured-of-a-pro-us-government-munter/

Theme: ''Nawaz, Imran Khan assured me of a pro-US government: Munter''

Karachi: Doing a interview US ambassador to Pakistan Cameron Munter, when asked by the BBC regarding the possibility of an anti-US goverment in Pakistan in case Nawaz Sharif or Imran Khan get elevted in 2013 elections, said that he has met both the leaders who have assured a pro-US government. Under the interview Munter underlined that US is not against Pakistan, rather it wants Pakistan to be independent, so it could be possible for Pakistan to take actions against the militants, who is hiding in the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan. He later gaved a definition, what he did mean about independent and that was decidely. Pakistani leadership, Pakistani army, should have control over it's territories. Munter emphasized how importent it is for Pakistan to eliminate the terrorist, and added, we won't to help Pakistan with it. Cameron Munter is set to retire early from his post, and said that we still have to deal with the terrorists in Pakistan, terrorists should take it as a warning. Reopning of Nato suply route is not enough, and stressed that Pakistan has to a part of the solution, not the problem. When he was reminded that US-government is against the Pakistan-Iran gas pipeline, Munter abrupt said ''If you talk to Pakistani leaders, you will get to know that there is no shortage of electricity in the country. It only needs good management, improvements and new rates.''

My opinion:

US-government already has given Pakistani leadership many trillion, with the view of that Pakistan is going through a hard time, they are fighting against the terrorists. And they are facing a lot of problems in different areas. Munter is right when he's argumentation for that US wan't to help Pakistan. They have don a lot for Pakistan. But they also have killed many people by their drone attacks in north Waziristan. I think it was wrong by Pakistani government to take the decission to reopen the Nato suply route through Pakistan to Afghanistan. Come on Nato has killed 40 Pakistani soldieres and the government maked such a wrong and cheap decission.

Discussion:

We all know that US army is attacking Pakistans terrories with drones
Is US stil a ally? How can you expect that Pakistani army can eliminate terrorists who has been supported by your own(US) people, army, politicians. It will take many years, ten years is not enough. Do you not remember Russian and Afghan war? Where US was supporting Taliban?
In that time Talibans were not called terrorists but ''The fighter for freedom''
Pakistani government has said that they have established a democracy state, so why are they not listning to the people of Pakistan?

Karachi: Doing a interview US ambassador to Pakistan Cameron Munter, when asked by the BBC regarding the possibility of an anti-US goverment in Pakistan in case Nawaz Sharif or Imran Khan get elevted in 2013 elections, said that he has met both the leaders who have assured a pro-US government. Under (during) the interview Munter underlined that US is not against Pakistan, rather it wants Pakistan to be independent, so it could be possible for Pakistan to take actions against the militants, who is hiding in the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan. He later gaved a definition, what he did mean about independent and that was decidely. Pakistani leadership, Pakistani army, should have control over it's(its) territories. Munter emphasized how importent it is for Pakistan to eliminate the terrorist, and added, we won't to help Pakistan with it. Cameron Munter is set(said) to retire early from his post, and said that we still have to deal with the terrorists in Pakistan, terrorists should take it as a warning. Reopning of Nato suply route is not enough, and stressed that Pakistan has to a part of the solution, not the problem. When he was reminded that US-government is against the Pakistan-Iran gas pipeline, Munter abrupt said ''If you talk to Pakistani leaders, you will get to know that there is no shortage of electricity in the country. It only needs good management, improvements and new rates.''

My opinion:
 

US-government already has given Pakistani leadership many trillion, with the view of that Pakistan is going through a hard time, they are fighting against the terrorists. And they are facing a lot of problems in different areas. Munter is right when he's argumentation for that US wan't to help Pakistan. They have don(done) a lot for Pakistan. But they also have killed many people by their drone attacks in north Waziristan. I think it was wrong by Pakistani government to take the decission to reopen the Nato suply route through Pakistan to Afghanistan. Come on Nato has killed 40 Pakistani soldieres(soldiers) and the government maked such a wrong and cheap decission(decesion)

Discussion:

We all know that US army is attacking Pakistans terrories with drones
Is US stil a ally? How can you expect that Pakistani army can eliminate terrorists who has been supported by your own(US) people, army, politicians. It will take many years, ten years is not enough. Do you not remember Russian and Afghan war? Where US was supporting Taliban?
In that time Talibans were not called terrorists but ''The fighter for freedom''
Pakistani government has said that they have established a democracy state, so why are they not listning to the people of Pakistan?
 

Det hvad jeg vil skrive, er sat i ring.

Meget fin opgave.

Pakistani government has said that they have established a democracy(democratic) state, so why are they not listning to the people of Pakistan?
 

We all know that US army is attacking Pakistans(Pakistan's) terrories(territories) with drones.

Tak :D jeg kommer selvfølge med ligne opgaver som i skal rette.

Nej, det skal vi faktisk ikke, #0. Det ville tjene din sag at droppe den flabede tone ("Ret min stil"; "I skal rette") og i stedet pænt og nydeligt spørge om hjælp. Sådan noget uopdragent "bad boy"-"wallah"-ghettopjat funker åbenbart på yngre kvindelige årgange (#1, #2), men du kan glemme alt om at komme nogen egentlige vegne i hovedsamfundet hvis du har tænkt dig at bjæffe og kommandere dig gennem tilværelsen.

De fremkomne "rettelser" gør imidlertid mere skade end gavn, så lidt kosmisk retfærdighed er der tilsyneladende til.

(mit engelske sprog; nemlig; et referat; nyhedsartikel; selvfølgelig; lignende)

På bl.a. dansk og engelsk har man normalt ikke et navneord i ental uden en artikel. Det giver derfor ingen mening at skrive:

"How can you expect that Pakistani army can" (#0) eller

"US-government already has given Pakistani leadership" (#0) eller

"How can you expect that Pakistani army....." (#1) eller

"Pakistani government has said that......" (#2) eller

123434,

Det er pænt af dig at ville hjælpe, men det er ikke godt at dine forslag er så fulde af grammatiske fejl og stavefejl at de ikke kan bruges som hjælp for nogen, men kun forvirrer og giver forkert besked.

Stygotius.

Du skriver:

På bl.a. dansk og engelsk har man normalt ikke et navneord i ental uden en artikel. Det giver derfor ingen mening at skrive:

"How can you expect that Pakistani army can" (#0) eller

"US-government already has given Pakistani leadership" (#0)
 

Er det så korrekt at skrive?

How can you expect that the Pakistani army can...

Ja, det er i hvert fald ikke vildt ukorrekt, men man ville sige "How can you expect the Pakistani army to.............."

(-tænk på admiral Nelsons berømte ord til sine mænd: "England expects every man to do his duty.

-sætning 2: "The US government has already given the Pakistani leaders (evt. "leadership) many trillion dollars........."