please help me...

Ville lige hører om der var nogle der ville rare hjælpe med at rette stavefejl og fejl. Tak på forhånd.

With the election of Barack Obama as next U.S. president, the Americans had a leader who can easily become one of the country's best presidents ever. His ability to inspire, not that he has lost focus and consistency of a long and dirty campaign, is quite unique in recent American history.

President Obama potential and his ability to inspire hope, does not mean that he will not disappoint many of his voters and especially many Europeans. On the contrary, there is every chance that many will be disappointed, just because they have been able to identify with the hope Obama inspires without really knowing much of his actual policy. And then of course, because he represents a break with George W. Bush, who according to polls is the most unpopular president in all that time, they have existed.

But how will Obama disappoint? And how will he disappoint the Europeans who have such high expectations for him? Let us look a couple of areas which we often hear about when the Danes and Europeans think of U.S. policy.

Foreign Policy Obama will no doubt try to change the tone we have come to expect from Washington. But in addition, there is not much that will change. Obama will be good enough pull U.S. troops out of Iraq and allocate them to Afghanistan. But it is not much different than what the Bush administration has been working towards in the past. Earlier this year, said Obama from the repatriation of troops Iraq would be his first priority if he were elected, however, what has changed in recent months, where he will no longer push for a quick end to the war.

When it comes to U.S. support for Israel, Obama will also continue the line as the current president has led, and even view Israel as the US's main ally. One major difference will be that Obama will resume diplomatic negotiations with Iran, what is consensus in U.S. diplomatic circles is the only way to get problems with Iran to life.

With regard to the U.S. unilateral attack, which under Bush we have heard so much about, is not a practice that a President Obama will change. On the contrary, he advocated that U.S. forces should attack in Pakistan without permission from the country's president, who’s senior Al-Qaeda, is located there. On the conflict between Georgia and Russia, which could give an insight into how Obama will act in a crisis as president, went there a few days before he joined it, as both Bush and McCain already had said.

So it is not without reason that the Washington Post has concluded that a President Obama's foreign policy "will remind a lot about it, we have seen in Bush's second term." One of Obama repeated election promises is that he will expand the military, what which hardly suggests that as president he would lead a more peaceful foreign policy than what we've seen over the past eight years. But just as Clinton he will probably show more sensitivity towards its European allies - at least rhetorically - before he throws the country into the major foreign adventures.

Domestic political support Obama fierce death penalty, as most other American politicians. Although he has previously written that he does not believe that death has no impact on crime, but since the Supreme Court in June rejected a bill that would make it possible to convict paedophiles’ rapists to death, Obama called for a press conference in which he expressed its apparent disagreement. Those who have raped children, it could face the death penalty, "they said.

As president Obama will not attempt to restrict Americans' access to weapons as such. He agrees that the Constitution gives Americans the right to bear arms, but will not prevent local bans or restrictions on weapons law, although such a law in Washington DC recently has been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. Finally, he said that sales of so-called assault weapons are an area where most Americans can agree that arms control is needed.

One area where there will doubtless be changes is the economy. And yet. Favourites for the post of Economy under Obama are mostly old favourite. Two of them, Larry Summer and Robert Rubin, were both ministers under the Clinton economy and laid the groundwork for the extreme deregulation, which today has a large share of the blame of the financial crisis. A third, the now eighty year olds Paul Volcker, was head of the National Bank before both Bernanke and Greenspan, raised interest rates in 1981 so drastically that it was countries such as Argentina and Brazil and several African countries in the bottomless debt. Such a dramatic and devastating rise in interest rates is nowadays known as the Volcker shock mixed economists. Moreover expected Obama quite unusual to appoint its economic team during a week or two.

When it comes to health insurance is a widespread myth that Obama would introduce public health insurance. Of all the Democratic candidates during the primary elections, each with its suggestions on how problems with health insurance were addressed, Obama was the least radical proposal. As president would Obama will make it mandatory that all children should have health insurance. But instead of offering them free health insurance through the state, he will offer low income families to buy their cheap health insurance through the state, which itself will go out and buy insurance in the private sector. However, Obama promised to work towards a stronger regulation of insurers, so they do not exclude Americans and as prices for health insurance will not always go up.

One area where Obama as president will make the big difference is energy policy - an area that he and McCain were broadly has been agreed. In Democratic circles talks about the California governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger is a very hot bid on Energy Obama in the upcoming government.

Across the United States allows millions of Americans rely on Obama and that he probably will make life a little better for them. The same goes for the rest of the world, which see Obama as the most civilized president, the U.S. has had in a long time. In spite of that he be given hope of millions, Obama is no Messiah, but a centrist Democrat with a unique political talents and a talent to inspire, there is absolutely no comparison.

Now can Barack Obama called himself the U.S. next president. There is still hope