Studieretningsprojekt/-opgave (SRP/SRO)
Abstract
Hey ville lige hører om der var nogle der gider rette mit abstract? Jeg skriver om kryptering i det 20. åhrhundrede og om RSA kryptering
This paper examines encryption in the 20th century. It especially studies the RSA-cipher system and the math behind it. The paper shows an example on how to make a RSA-cipher system so that you can encrypt a secret message with a public key and then decrypt it with a secret key that both have been created. It also discusses the importance of cipher systems in the 20th century according to states, companies and the private people.
To outline the history of cryptology throughout the 20th century the paper focuses on the development from it being only for military purposes, where the cipher systems were simple and easy to decrypt, to the public key cipher system that private persons also use today, which is much safer. To explain the RSA-cipher system the paper examines the structure of the system and demonstrates the mathematics in RSA and gives examples to make the theory more understandable. The RSA-cipher system example is made based on the theory in the previous paragraph and it’s used to show that you can put the theory into practice. When the paper goes through the discussion it uses examples to describe the situation in the different cases. The main example is Phil Zimmerman and PGP and how his trail infected the world and started the debate of free encryption vs. government controlled encryption and protection of the legal rights.
The paper concludes, against the background of the theory and the example, that the RSA-cipher system is insoluble. It’s based on the prime factorization problem and finding the two primes is impossible in a reasonable matter of time. It’s therefore safe to use in our society. The debate of whether or not free encryption should be allowed is a debate that will never find a definitive answer. But the paper concludes that the law will fluctuate between free encryption until a serious crime occurs and an encryption policy with limits until the authorities exploit their power and the people will demand free encryption back. And so it will go back and forth.
På forhånd tak.
Svar #1
17. december 2008 af signenene (Slettet)
Tusind tak for rettelserne!
Når du skriver "System so that you can encrypt.." Ville jeg nok ændre det til System, which makes it possible to encrypt, men det andet er ikke direkte forkert.
"Is made based on" er lidt at gentage sig selv, jeg tror jeg ville nøjes med at skrive "based on" idet du jo inden siger at der er tale om et eksempel og at der derfor er underforstået at det er lavet. Hvis du forstår min lidt uklare formulering:)
Ellers er det meget interessant og velformuleret, samtidig med at du bevæger dig hen over de taksonomiske niveauer.
Signe
Skriv et svar til: Abstract
Du skal være logget ind, for at skrive et svar til dette spørgsmål. Klik her for at logge ind.
Har du ikke en bruger på Studieportalen.dk?
Klik her for at oprette en bruger.
