Engelsk
Eng.!
12. september 2003 af
SP anonym (Slettet)
Ville blive glad, hvis nogen vil se om dette er ok mht. sætningsopbygning.
Hvorfor har historien altid glemt kvinderne?
Alle historiebøger handler om mænd og mænds beslutninger, og dog har den halve verden altid været kvinder.
Hvordan levede, hvad lavede de, hvilke tanker havde de, hvad syntes de om livet? Dette er nogle af de ting, som kvindelige forskere er begyndt at interessere sig for.
En af dem siger: ”Da jeg gik i skole, blev kvinderne beskrevet som passive and reaktionære. Men jeg kunne ikke acceptere denne fordom. Heller ikke, at kvinderne blev glemt. Så derfor arbejder jeg nu med denne nye historieskrivning.
Selvfølgelig mener jeg, at historien bør handle om mennesker og ikke kun om kvinder. Men lige nu er det meget vigtigt at koncentrere sig om kvinder, fordi de har været fuldstændig forsømt. Det er derfor meget vigtigt at kritisere de gammeldags historiebøger, så kvinder kan læse om kvinder og derved opbygge en historisk identitet.
Kun hvis den unge generations kvinder lærer at respektere deres ”formødre”, kan de lære at respektere sig selv.
Why has history always forgotten the women?
All history books are about men and men’s decisions, and though half of the world has always been women.
How did they live, what did they do, what thoughts did they have, what did they think of live? These are some of the things, as female research workers have started begun to show interest for.
One of then says:” When I went to school, the women were described as passive and reactionaries. But I could not accept this prejudice. Nor that the women were forgotten. So therefore I now work with this new writing of history.
Of course I think that history should be about people and not only about women. But right now it is very important to concentrate about women, because they have been completely neglected. There it is very important to criticise the old-fashioned history books, written by men about men. In stead we have to write new history books, so women can read bout women and thereby edify a historical identity.
Only if the young generation of women learn to respect their "....” can learn to respect themselves.
Hvorfor har historien altid glemt kvinderne?
Alle historiebøger handler om mænd og mænds beslutninger, og dog har den halve verden altid været kvinder.
Hvordan levede, hvad lavede de, hvilke tanker havde de, hvad syntes de om livet? Dette er nogle af de ting, som kvindelige forskere er begyndt at interessere sig for.
En af dem siger: ”Da jeg gik i skole, blev kvinderne beskrevet som passive and reaktionære. Men jeg kunne ikke acceptere denne fordom. Heller ikke, at kvinderne blev glemt. Så derfor arbejder jeg nu med denne nye historieskrivning.
Selvfølgelig mener jeg, at historien bør handle om mennesker og ikke kun om kvinder. Men lige nu er det meget vigtigt at koncentrere sig om kvinder, fordi de har været fuldstændig forsømt. Det er derfor meget vigtigt at kritisere de gammeldags historiebøger, så kvinder kan læse om kvinder og derved opbygge en historisk identitet.
Kun hvis den unge generations kvinder lærer at respektere deres ”formødre”, kan de lære at respektere sig selv.
Why has history always forgotten the women?
All history books are about men and men’s decisions, and though half of the world has always been women.
How did they live, what did they do, what thoughts did they have, what did they think of live? These are some of the things, as female research workers have started begun to show interest for.
One of then says:” When I went to school, the women were described as passive and reactionaries. But I could not accept this prejudice. Nor that the women were forgotten. So therefore I now work with this new writing of history.
Of course I think that history should be about people and not only about women. But right now it is very important to concentrate about women, because they have been completely neglected. There it is very important to criticise the old-fashioned history books, written by men about men. In stead we have to write new history books, so women can read bout women and thereby edify a historical identity.
Only if the young generation of women learn to respect their "....” can learn to respect themselves.
Svar #1
13. september 2003 af Katrine (Slettet)
why has history always forgotten women?
All hostory books are about men and men's decisions, even though half of the world population has always been women.
How did they live, what did they do, what thoughts did they have of life? These are some of the things (questions) that female scientists have started to show interest in.
One of them says; "When I went to school, the women were descibed as passive and reactionare. But I could not this prejudice. Nor that the women were forgotten. That is why I am now working on this new writing of history.
Of course I think that history should be about people and not just about women. But right now it is very important to focus on women because they have been completely neglected. It is therefore very important to critizise the oldfashioned history books so that women can read about women and by that (ellere thereby) build a historical identity.
Only if the women of the young generation learn to respect their female ancestors, they can learn to respect themselves.
All hostory books are about men and men's decisions, even though half of the world population has always been women.
How did they live, what did they do, what thoughts did they have of life? These are some of the things (questions) that female scientists have started to show interest in.
One of them says; "When I went to school, the women were descibed as passive and reactionare. But I could not this prejudice. Nor that the women were forgotten. That is why I am now working on this new writing of history.
Of course I think that history should be about people and not just about women. But right now it is very important to focus on women because they have been completely neglected. It is therefore very important to critizise the oldfashioned history books so that women can read about women and by that (ellere thereby) build a historical identity.
Only if the women of the young generation learn to respect their female ancestors, they can learn to respect themselves.
Svar #2
13. september 2003 af Katrine (Slettet)
whoops... hostory = history
og har lige glemt ordet accept mellm not og this prejudice.
Female ancestors brugte jeg bare, da ancestors betyder forfædre.
og har lige glemt ordet accept mellm not og this prejudice.
Female ancestors brugte jeg bare, da ancestors betyder forfædre.
Skriv et svar til: Eng.!
Du skal være logget ind, for at skrive et svar til dette spørgsmål. Klik her for at logge ind.
Har du ikke en bruger på Studieportalen.dk?
Klik her for at oprette en bruger.