Engelsk
et ultrakort essay
06. oktober 2007 af
Bruger slettet (Slettet)
Hej!
Nogen der gerne vil kigge mit essay igennem for fejl?
…An argument for using death penalty is deterrence. Like “It is necessary to kill an offender to dissuade other people from committing, the same kind of crime”. Empirical evidence does not support this argument. At their point of view, most murders are committed in moments when extreme emotion overcomes reason, or under the influence of alcohol or drugs. It could also be in moments of panic, or because the person is mentally ill. In none of these cases can fear of death penalty be expected to deter. Moreover, if we look at the facts we would expect to find that those countries, that have the death penalty, would have a lower rate of crime than those, which don't. That is, if the argument of deterrence is truthful. However, in the United States, the state if Florida had the highest rate of murder in the state’s history, in the years following the resumption of executions. It also happened in Georgia. So perhaps the opposite may even be argued.
Nogen der gerne vil kigge mit essay igennem for fejl?
…An argument for using death penalty is deterrence. Like “It is necessary to kill an offender to dissuade other people from committing, the same kind of crime”. Empirical evidence does not support this argument. At their point of view, most murders are committed in moments when extreme emotion overcomes reason, or under the influence of alcohol or drugs. It could also be in moments of panic, or because the person is mentally ill. In none of these cases can fear of death penalty be expected to deter. Moreover, if we look at the facts we would expect to find that those countries, that have the death penalty, would have a lower rate of crime than those, which don't. That is, if the argument of deterrence is truthful. However, in the United States, the state if Florida had the highest rate of murder in the state’s history, in the years following the resumption of executions. It also happened in Georgia. So perhaps the opposite may even be argued.
Svar #1
06. oktober 2007 af Erik Morsing (Slettet)
Din fremstilling har ikke hold i virkeligheden, årsagen til at forbrydelserne foregår er den lette adgang til våben, og årsagen til at der foretages dødsstraf er ren hævn - af hensyn til de efterladtes sjælefred.
Svar #2
06. oktober 2007 af Bruger slettet (Slettet)
Ja, det ved godt… men der skal tages udgangspunkt i en artikel
Svar #3
06. oktober 2007 af Erik Morsing (Slettet)
An argument for using death penalty is deterrence. Like “It is necessary to kill an offender to dissuade other people from committing the same kind of crime”. Empirical evidence does not support this argument. (From) (this) point of view, most murders are committed in moments when extreme emotion overcomes reason, or under the influence of alcohol or drugs. It could also be in moments of panic, or because the person is mentally ill. In none of these cases can fear of death penalty be expected to deter. Moreover, if we look at the facts we would expect to find that those countries, that have the death penalty, would have a lower rate of crime than those, which don't. That is, if the argument of deterrence is truthful. However, in the United States, the state (of) Florida had the highest rate of murder in the state’s history, in the years following the resumption of executions. It also happened in Georgia. So perhaps the opposite may even be argued.
Skriv et svar til: et ultrakort essay
Du skal være logget ind, for at skrive et svar til dette spørgsmål. Klik her for at logge ind.
Har du ikke en bruger på Studieportalen.dk?
Klik her for at oprette en bruger.