Engelsk
Hjælp til oversættelse
23. januar 2008 af
DetNini (Slettet)
Vil du læse min oversættelse igennem og rette for trælse fejl?
Her er den danske del:
En værdig død
Mennesket er skabningens herre, men betyder det, at vi kan bruge dyrene i vores eksperimenter og tage deres liv for at beskytte vores eget? Vi bruger hunde, katte, kaniner, heste og mus i videnskabelige forsøg for at finde årsager til sygdomme, men vi gør det også for at finde ud af, om f.eks. de kunstige farvestoffer i maden er farlige, eller for at se, om de dejlige sæber og parfumer, som gør os så tiltrækkende, er skadelige. I nogle forsøg hælder vi shampoo i øjnene på kaniner for at se, hvad der sker. Hvis deres øjne falder ud, er der noget galt med produktet. I andre forsøg giver vi meget sultne rotter kosmetik til morgenmad. Hvis de ikke dør, vil det barn, som har spist sin mors læbestift, også overleve. Vi kan lære meget af vores eksperimenter med dyr, ikke sandt? Men er det i orden at bruge millioner af dyr i vores forsøg, og er der ikke andre muligheder?
A Dignified Death
Man is the Lord of Creation but does that mean that we can use animals in our experiments and take their lives/kill them to protect our own life? We use dogs, cats, rabbits, horses and mice in scientific experiments to find reasons for diseases but we also do it to find out whether e.g. artificial colouring in the food is dangerous or to see whether lovely soap and perfume, which make us so attractive, are harmful. In some experiments we put shampoo in rabbits‘s eyes to see what happens. If their eyes fall out there is something wrong with the product. In other experiments we give very hungry rats cosmetics for breakfast. If they do not die, will the child, who has eaten its mother’s lipstick, also survive. We learn a lot from our experiments with animals, right? But is it okay to use millions of animals in our experiments and is there no other option?
Her er den danske del:
En værdig død
Mennesket er skabningens herre, men betyder det, at vi kan bruge dyrene i vores eksperimenter og tage deres liv for at beskytte vores eget? Vi bruger hunde, katte, kaniner, heste og mus i videnskabelige forsøg for at finde årsager til sygdomme, men vi gør det også for at finde ud af, om f.eks. de kunstige farvestoffer i maden er farlige, eller for at se, om de dejlige sæber og parfumer, som gør os så tiltrækkende, er skadelige. I nogle forsøg hælder vi shampoo i øjnene på kaniner for at se, hvad der sker. Hvis deres øjne falder ud, er der noget galt med produktet. I andre forsøg giver vi meget sultne rotter kosmetik til morgenmad. Hvis de ikke dør, vil det barn, som har spist sin mors læbestift, også overleve. Vi kan lære meget af vores eksperimenter med dyr, ikke sandt? Men er det i orden at bruge millioner af dyr i vores forsøg, og er der ikke andre muligheder?
A Dignified Death
Man is the Lord of Creation but does that mean that we can use animals in our experiments and take their lives/kill them to protect our own life? We use dogs, cats, rabbits, horses and mice in scientific experiments to find reasons for diseases but we also do it to find out whether e.g. artificial colouring in the food is dangerous or to see whether lovely soap and perfume, which make us so attractive, are harmful. In some experiments we put shampoo in rabbits‘s eyes to see what happens. If their eyes fall out there is something wrong with the product. In other experiments we give very hungry rats cosmetics for breakfast. If they do not die, will the child, who has eaten its mother’s lipstick, also survive. We learn a lot from our experiments with animals, right? But is it okay to use millions of animals in our experiments and is there no other option?
Svar #1
23. januar 2008 af -Zeta- (Slettet)
Man is the Lord of creation, but does that mean that we can use animals in our experiments and take their lives in order to protect our own? We use dogs, cats, rabbits, horses and mice in scientific experiments to find causes of diseases. But we also do it to find out whether e.g. the artificial colourings in the food are dangerous or to see if the lovely soaps and perfumes that make us attractive are harmful. In some experiments we pour shampoo in the eyes of rabbits to see what happens. If their eyes fall out there is something wrong with the product. In other experiments we feed very hungry rats cosmetics for breakfast. If they do not die, the child who has eaten his mother‘s lipstick will also survive. Indeed we can learn much from our experiments with animals, right? But is it fair to use millions of animals in our experiments and are there not other options?
Skriv et svar til: Hjælp til oversættelse
Du skal være logget ind, for at skrive et svar til dette spørgsmål. Klik her for at logge ind.
Har du ikke en bruger på Studieportalen.dk?
Klik her for at oprette en bruger.