hjælp :(

upload igen, filen er i stykker

her er den

stadig problemer med indholdet.

God or Darwin

But in Kansas they don’t care.
During the summer, the States educations advice will hold a decided lawsuit, where it shall rule on, whether God, the school council or Darwin is right.

In the so called creations-movement organization, 50 experts will argue for, that Charles Darwins evolutions-theory is false, ungodly and misleading…
The lawyer John Calvert, who leads Kansas >> intelligent Design Network<<, will propose, with support from the school council, that all classes in evolutions-theory, dinosaur-lives and sundries prestate to the human race shall be forbidden and replace with lessons in the Old Testament, where it is our familar Lord, who handles with the job in six days.
That kind of things can maybe make (kold ned af ryggen) on European teachers and parents. But in Kansas there is both in the population and in school council (six against four) majority to the reactionary theory.
Like that numerous society >>intiligent Design Network<< do these mean that the globes life is to much complicated and wonderful to be a result of a accidental development, as Darwin describes it.
>> there must stand a intelligent creation back this creation. And it kan only be God- our creator and master,<< says lawyer John Calvert.

Gud eller Darwin

Men I Kansas er de ligeglad. I løbet af sommeren vil statens uddannelsesråd nemlig afholde en decideret retssag, hvor det skal afgøres, hvorvidt Gud, skolerådet eller Darwin har ret. 50 eksperter inden for den såkaldte skabelses-bevægelse vil argumentere for, at Charles Darwins evolutions-teori er falsk, ugudelig og misvisende. Advorkaten John Calvert,der leder Kansas >> intilligent design network<< vil med støtte fra skolerådet foreslå, at al undervisning i evolutionsteori, dinosaur-liv og diverse prestadier til menneskeracen forbydes og alene erstattes med undervisning i den gamle testamente, hvori det som bekendt er Vorherre, der klarer jobbet på de berømte seks dage. Den slags kan måske få det til at løbe koldt ned ad ryggen på europæiske lærere og forældre. Men i kansas er der både i befolkningen og i skolerådet (seks mod fire) flertal for den bagstræberiske teori. Ligesom den talstærke forening >> intilligend design network<< mener disse to flertal, at klodns liv er alt for kompliceret og vidunderligt til ar være resultatet af en tilfældig udvikling, som Darwin beskriver det.>> der må stå en intilligent skabning bag skabelsen. Og det kan kun være Gud- vor skaber og mester,<< siger advokat John Calvert.

Jeg kigger på det i morgen.

okey tak (:

1. du skal altid holde samme form som den originale tekst. Det gælder både mht. sprog og opbygning .

God or Darwin

But in Kansas they don’t care. During the summer, the States educations advice¹ will hold a decided² lawsuit, where it shall rule on³, whether God, the school council or Darwin is right. In the so called creations-movement organization, 50 experts will argue for,⁴ that(!!) Charles Darwins ¹⁷evolutions-theory is false, ungodly and misleading…⁵The lawyer John Calvert, who leads Kansas ¹⁸>> intelligent Design Network<<, will propose⁶, with support from the school council, that⁷ all classes in evolutions-theory, dinosaur-lives and sundries prestate to the human race shall be forbidden and replace⁸ with lessons in the Old Testament, where it is our familar Lord⁹, who handles ¹⁰with the job in six days. That kind of things can maybe make (kold ned af ryggen) on European teachers and parents.¹¹ But in Kansas there is both in the population and in school council (six against four) majority to the reactionary theory. Like that numerous society >>intiligent Design Network<< do these mean that the globes life is to much complicated and wonderful to be a result of a accidental development,¹² as Darwin describes it. >> there must stand a ¹³intelligent creation back ¹⁴this creation. And it kan¹⁵ only be God- our creator and master,<< says lawyer John Calvert.¹⁶

¹The state's educational council

²slå op igen. Decided kan ikke bruges i denne sammenhæng find på en ny formulering og spørg hvis du er i tvivl

³brug ikke rule. du har oversat "bestemme" direkte. Decide er mere rigtigt i denne sammenhæng.

⁴Præposition + that. Det er meget fy-fy. udelad derfor "for". Desuden aldrig komma foran "that" på engelsk

⁵Hvorfor så mange punktummer? virker dumt når der i den originale tekst kun er et.

⁶Udelad propose

⁷komma foran that

⁸Verbets tid. tilføj -d endelsen. "replaced"

⁹"where it is our lord

¹⁰Du skal oversætte så direkte som muligt. brug "does"

¹¹Such things could quite possibly send shivers down the spine of European teachers and parents

¹² Heeelt fejloversat. Du har slet ikke fået meningen med. Prøv med dette: "Like the populated "union intelligent design network", These two majorities think that the life of the earth is much too complicated and wonderful to be a result of a random development, as Darwin describes it

¹³an, ikke a. Brug an ved vokallyde og a ved konsonantlyde

¹⁴Behind, ikke back. Back er enten "tilbage" eller "ryg"

¹⁵"can" staves ikke med K

¹⁶forkert ordstilling, prøv med: "lawyer John Calvert says"

¹⁷apostrof mangler

¹⁸Enten "Leads the kansas intelligent(...) etc. eller "Leads Kansa's intelligent(...)" etc

Tusind tak for hjælpen igen!!

Helt i orden. får jeg en "Brugbart svar" ? (: