Engelsk
FINGERSEN I NEED HELP !!!
21. april 2004 af
Studietøs (Slettet)
Til Fingersen !
Tusinde tak fordi du har rettet to af mine engelsk oversættelser, det er jeg meget glad for.
Ville høre om du ik også gad kigge denne oversættelse igennem ?
Vi har fået en mega stor engelsk aflevering for, det er derfor jeg kommer med så meget. men ville libev super glad hvis du gad, for jeg skal aflevere i morgen.
Andre må selvfølgelig også kigge den igennem :)
På dansk :
Det er godt der nu bliver overvåget på fabrikker, og det er noget der burde være gjort for lang tid siden.
vi forbruger får bare af vide at fabrikkerne bliver overvåget. Det er jo noget de sagtens kan bilde os ind. men på den anden side, er der ik rigtig andet de kan gøre, and at fortælle os de sørger for der bliver overvåget. Så er det op til den enkelte person om man vil tro på det eller ej.
Jeg har aldrig forbundet Nike tegnet med underbetaling, og jeg vil da stadig købe Nike mærker.
Men jeg synes i hvert fald det er godt med overvågning
på Engelsk:
It is a good thing that the factories is now being monitored, and it is something there should have been done a long time ago.
Us consumers are just getting told that the factories are being monitored. it is something they easily could tell us. But in the other way, there is nothing else they could do, then to tell us that they make sure to monitor the factories.
Then it is up to the individual person to believe it or not.
I have never associated the swoosh with sweatshop, and I will still buy Nike brands.
But i definatly think it is a good thing with monitoring
Tusinde tak fordi du har rettet to af mine engelsk oversættelser, det er jeg meget glad for.
Ville høre om du ik også gad kigge denne oversættelse igennem ?
Vi har fået en mega stor engelsk aflevering for, det er derfor jeg kommer med så meget. men ville libev super glad hvis du gad, for jeg skal aflevere i morgen.
Andre må selvfølgelig også kigge den igennem :)
På dansk :
Det er godt der nu bliver overvåget på fabrikker, og det er noget der burde være gjort for lang tid siden.
vi forbruger får bare af vide at fabrikkerne bliver overvåget. Det er jo noget de sagtens kan bilde os ind. men på den anden side, er der ik rigtig andet de kan gøre, and at fortælle os de sørger for der bliver overvåget. Så er det op til den enkelte person om man vil tro på det eller ej.
Jeg har aldrig forbundet Nike tegnet med underbetaling, og jeg vil da stadig købe Nike mærker.
Men jeg synes i hvert fald det er godt med overvågning
på Engelsk:
It is a good thing that the factories is now being monitored, and it is something there should have been done a long time ago.
Us consumers are just getting told that the factories are being monitored. it is something they easily could tell us. But in the other way, there is nothing else they could do, then to tell us that they make sure to monitor the factories.
Then it is up to the individual person to believe it or not.
I have never associated the swoosh with sweatshop, and I will still buy Nike brands.
But i definatly think it is a good thing with monitoring
Svar #1
21. april 2004 af michael.padowan.dk (Slettet)
It is a good thing that the factories *are* now being monitored, and it is something *that* should have been done a long time ago.
*We* consumers are just *being* told that the factories are being monitored. *It* is something they could *<->* easily tell us. But *from* the other *point of view* there is nothing else they could do, *but telling* us that they make sure to monitor the factories.
Then it is up to the individual person to believe it or not.
I have never associated the swoosh with sweatshop, and I will still buy Nike brands.
But *I* *definitely* think it is a good thing with monitoring.
*We* consumers are just *being* told that the factories are being monitored. *It* is something they could *<->* easily tell us. But *from* the other *point of view* there is nothing else they could do, *but telling* us that they make sure to monitor the factories.
Then it is up to the individual person to believe it or not.
I have never associated the swoosh with sweatshop, and I will still buy Nike brands.
But *I* *definitely* think it is a good thing with monitoring.
Svar #3
21. april 2004 af Fingersen (Slettet)
Jeg giver også lige mit besyv med (stort set ikke mange ændringer ift Mbipsen):
It is a good thing that factories now are monitored, and it is something that should have been done a long time ago.
We, the consumers, are just told that the factories are monitored.
Indeed, it is something they could easily tell us.
However, on the other hand, there is really nothing else they could do besides telling that they make sure the factories are monitored.
Then it is up to the individual person to believe it or not.
I have never associated the swoosh with sweatshop, and I will still buy Nike brands.
However, I definitely think that monitoring is a good idea.
MVH
Fingersen
It is a good thing that factories now are monitored, and it is something that should have been done a long time ago.
We, the consumers, are just told that the factories are monitored.
Indeed, it is something they could easily tell us.
However, on the other hand, there is really nothing else they could do besides telling that they make sure the factories are monitored.
Then it is up to the individual person to believe it or not.
I have never associated the swoosh with sweatshop, and I will still buy Nike brands.
However, I definitely think that monitoring is a good idea.
MVH
Fingersen
Skriv et svar til: FINGERSEN I NEED HELP !!!
Du skal være logget ind, for at skrive et svar til dette spørgsmål. Klik her for at logge ind.
Har du ikke en bruger på Studieportalen.dk?
Klik her for at oprette en bruger.