En kort rettelse (Haster)

Davs :)

Ville være taknemmelig hvis nogle gad rette for fejl.

Om den kriminelle lavalder skal sættes ned er et tilbagevendende tema i den offentlige debat. Ikke så snart har en mindreårig begået en forbrydelse, før temaet endnu engang dukker op i avisernes spalter.
Skal man begribe, hvad den kriminelle lavalder gør godt for, må man se den i et samfundsmæssigt perspektiv. At børn ikke er personligt ansvarlige for deres handlinger betyder ikke, at ingen er ansvarlige for børns handlinger, da det er utænkeligt, at der i samfundet skulle findes menneskelig adfærd, som ikke er nogens ansvar. De umyndige er underlagt andres myndighed; og ansvaret for deres handlinger ligger klart hos dem, der har myndighed over dem.
Hvad børn angår, hører de under forældrenes myndighed, og forældrene er ansvarlige for deres opførsel. Man stiller derfor ikke sagen på spidsen ved at hævde, at hvis børn overtræder loven, er det forældrene, som er forbrydere, og følgelig er det dem, der skal straffes.

About the age of criminal responsibility should puts down, are a returning theme in the public debate. Not soon had an under age makes crime, before theme once more, once again dive up in the newspapers column.
Should it comprehend, what the criminal responsibility doing god for, may we see from a social perspective. That children not is personal responsible for their actions not mean, that none is responsible for children actions, because it is unthinkable, that there in the society should being people behavior, that not are some who are responsibility for. They who are under age attach to another’s authority; and the responsibility for their actions stand with them, who have authority over them.
Relate the children, belong they under the parent’s authority, and the parents are responsibility for their behaviors. Therefore supporter one not the case on critical, with to hold one, that if children offender law, are it the parent who are the criminal, and are them consequently who should punished.