engang mere..

To what extent people are free to choose their own lives? It is an important question.
We living(live) in a world, where people can very fast and easy get (very fast and easily can get) information on the hole(whole) world plan, about every thing they do not hear about before(they havn't heard about before), with the many and effective Medias. (with the very effective Medias) It give(gives) their life (a) knew outlook; it could be (in) a positive or negative look.
Earlier in the history, people did not have the same opportunity to choice a different way of living.
They were commit oneself too the tradition and religion, (They commited themself to traditions and religions) and could not get a different way of living, or (a) new lifestyle.
Today people are much more “open mind”(openminded) and “free”,(lad vær med at brug "") especially the young people because they are more individualistic and are not grip by the traditional authority and religion like earlier in the history.
In a country were democracy exists, they (there) are many different groups and majority which people are more open for it(to). If they didn’t like their way of living, they accept their style because the other have accept the others style too. (Forstår simpelthen ikke sætningen)
If a person for example chooses to join a group with a new lifestyle and maybe politic, the family and friends will not be very happy for it and maybe rejected (and would mabey rejects it). But it will never be a surprise for anyone, because today we all are free to choose a different and specially life in a wide extent.
When the extent people are free to choose their own lives are extensive and large, than (then) we have to talking (talk) about the consequences, because people choose(choise) may not annoy the society and actually not hurt the person who choose(chooses) one’s life.

Det er så mine rettelser.. Held og lykke

mange tak lulu90...hm er det meget dårligt...(især ordstillingen og komma)??

If they didn’t like their way of living, they accept their style because the other have accept the others style too. (Forstår simpelthen ikke sætningen) :

jeg mente at hvis man ikke kunne lide de andres livstil, må man alligevel accep. det fordi de andre(med den ny stil) har accept. deres??:.forstår du..

Nej det er ikke dårligt, men du må ikke tænke så meget på dansk, din ordstilling er meget fordansket.. og husk 3.pers.ental S!!!!!
Du må gerne skrive hvis du har andre engelske stile, så jeg kan "følge med" i dit engelsk..
OG en anden ting er pas på med ing-form (to do - doing) Brug den kun hvor der på dansk ville står ”være ved at”, ”være i færd med”, "være i gang med" (der er selvfølgelig få undtagelser, som way of living)

Okay.. jeg forstår, det er rigtig nok oversat, men bare en smule uklart...
If they didn't like the other groups livestyle, they just had to accept it, because the people of the group already had accepted theirs.. It is like mutual (gensidig) respect.

Knus mig

..okey har du rettet min "dansk ordstilling"?...

.mange mange tak for hjælpen..jo tak jeg vil meget gerne send min stile...

1000 tak :-))..

hav det godt..

altså jeg kan godt rette den så den er stort set fejlfri, men ville din lære så ikke undre sig lidt?