Engelsk
Kort oversættelse
06. marts 2007 af
skallersk (Slettet)
Jeg har en kort tekst som skal oversættes til engelsk. Kan i finde nogle fejl vil jeg blive meget glad:
For 26 år siden holdt FN sin første miljøkonference i Stockholm.
Men først i sommeren 1992 blev den fulgt op af endnu en konference i Rio de Janeiro.
Hvad er der så sket i de forløbne år? I den årlige rapport fra Worldwatch Institute i Washington står der følgende:
”Skal Rio-topmødet blot betragtes som en vellykket medie-begivenhed, der ikke bidrog tilstrækkeligt til at løse verdens miljøproblemer? En så negativ dom ville nok være for hård, selv om forandringerne hidtil er gået frustrerende langsomt. Det er trods alt en kendsgerning at det på miljøtopmødet lykkedes at starte en udvikling, som vil bære frugt i fremtiden”
26 years ago FN had their first environment-conference in Stockholm.
Until the summer in 1992 was it followed up by yet another conference in Rio de Janeiro.
What has happened in the previous years?
In the yearly rapport from Worldwatch Institute in Washington it says: “Should the Rio-summit just be considered as a successful Media event that didn’t contribute enough to solve the world’s environment problems? Such a negative judgment would probably be too hard even though the changes so far have past frustrating slow. Even though it is a fact that on the environment summit it succeeded to start a development that will bear fruit in the future
For 26 år siden holdt FN sin første miljøkonference i Stockholm.
Men først i sommeren 1992 blev den fulgt op af endnu en konference i Rio de Janeiro.
Hvad er der så sket i de forløbne år? I den årlige rapport fra Worldwatch Institute i Washington står der følgende:
”Skal Rio-topmødet blot betragtes som en vellykket medie-begivenhed, der ikke bidrog tilstrækkeligt til at løse verdens miljøproblemer? En så negativ dom ville nok være for hård, selv om forandringerne hidtil er gået frustrerende langsomt. Det er trods alt en kendsgerning at det på miljøtopmødet lykkedes at starte en udvikling, som vil bære frugt i fremtiden”
26 years ago FN had their first environment-conference in Stockholm.
Until the summer in 1992 was it followed up by yet another conference in Rio de Janeiro.
What has happened in the previous years?
In the yearly rapport from Worldwatch Institute in Washington it says: “Should the Rio-summit just be considered as a successful Media event that didn’t contribute enough to solve the world’s environment problems? Such a negative judgment would probably be too hard even though the changes so far have past frustrating slow. Even though it is a fact that on the environment summit it succeeded to start a development that will bear fruit in the future
Svar #1
07. marts 2007 af BoWie (Slettet)
Det ville være frækt at oversætte FN til UN(United Nations).
Der er en sætning jeg studser lidt over her er det jeg hellere ville skrive:
- But first in the summer of 1992 it was followed up by yet another conference in Rio dae Janeiro
- What has then happened during the past years?
- didn't contribute sufficiently to solve the world's environment problems.
- It's after all a fact that...
Håber det hjælper dig lidt!
Der er en sætning jeg studser lidt over her er det jeg hellere ville skrive:
- But first in the summer of 1992 it was followed up by yet another conference in Rio dae Janeiro
- What has then happened during the past years?
- didn't contribute sufficiently to solve the world's environment problems.
- It's after all a fact that...
Håber det hjælper dig lidt!
Skriv et svar til: Kort oversættelse
Du skal være logget ind, for at skrive et svar til dette spørgsmål. Klik her for at logge ind.
Har du ikke en bruger på Studieportalen.dk?
Klik her for at oprette en bruger.