Engelsk
Bare et par sætninger!!! haster!
Heej,, er der lige nogen, som hurtig kan kigge på de værste grama-fejl i min oversættelse ??
Bare et par sætninger...
De fleste mennesker holder af naturen. De tider er for længst forbi, hvor man lidt arrogant kunne tale om ”Naturen – det billige skidt”. Men der er sket store skader i fremskridtets og den menneskelige begærligheds navn, og følgende overvejelser afdækker langt mindre end toppen af bjerget.
Det meste af det, mennesker foretager sig, foregår på naturens bekostning, for eksempel det at grave efter mineraler og metal- og naturligvis også det at bore efter olie. For slet ikke at nævne det enorme forbrug af papir i vores del af verden.
hvis andre folkeslag brugte ligeså meget toiletpapir som os, ville verden hurtigt risikere at komme til at mangle skove.
Er det samfundets skyld? Historien viser – ligesom naturvidenskaben - at de mest primitive samfund forurener betydelig mindre end os, delvis fordi de mangler den nødvendige teknologi til virkelig at svine. Ligesom indianerne var mennesker inden for den eskimoiske kultur vant til at bruge alt, hvad de fangede uden at lade noget gå til spilde.
Most people are nature lovers. Those days are past long ago, where you could talk a little arrogant about “The nature - it is dirt cheap”. But great damage in the progress’ and the human greediness’ name has been there. And the following considerations cover mush less than the top of the mountain.
Most of what people are doing, is nature's expense. For example the digging for the minerals and metals and ofcouse drilling for oil. Not to mention the enormous consumption of paper in our part of the world.
if other nations spent as much toilet paper as us, the world would soon run the risk of getting to be lacking forests.
Is that society's fault? History shows - like science - the most primitive societies pollute considerably less than us,partly because they lack the necessary technology to really pig. Like the Indians were people within the eskimo culture accustomed to using everything they caught without letting anything go to waste.
Svar #1
11. januar 2009 af imc712 (Slettet)
Hej. Jeg har rettet din tekst. Du skal bare kopiere den:
Most people care about the nature. Those days where you could talk a little arrogant about “The nature – the cheap dirt” is gone a long time ago. But there have been great damages in the progresses and in the human’s greediness name and the following considerations cover mush less than the top of the mountain.
Most of what people are doing is at nature’s expense, for example the digging for the minerals and metals and of course drilling for oil. Not to mention the enormous amount of paper we use in our part of the world.
If other nations spent as much toilet paper as we do, then soon the world wouldn’t have any forests left.
Is that society's fault? History shows - like science – that the most primitive societies pollute considerably less than us, partly because they don’t the necessary technology to make a mess. Like the Indians were people within the Eskimo culture used to using everything they caught without letting anything go to waste.
Men der er faktisk en sætning som jeg er lidt usikker på. Du har skrevet: But great damage in the progress’ and the human greediness’ name has been there.
og jeg har rettet det til: But there have been great damages in the progresses and in the human’s greediness name.
Jeg er sikker på at det de "has been there" ikke er rigtig men ikke resten.
Håber du akn bruge det.
Iman :)
Svar #2
11. januar 2009 af Erik Morsing (Slettet)
Mine forslag:
Most people are nature lovers. Those days are past long ago, where you could talk a little arrogant about “The nature - it is dirt cheap”. But major damages in the progress’ and the human greediness’ name has occurred. And the following considerations cover mush less than does the top of the mountain.
Most of what people are doing, is nature's expense. For example the digging for the minerals and metals and of course drilling for oil. Not to mention the enormous consumption of paper in our part of the world.
If other nations spent as much toilet paper as we do, the world would soon run the risk of getting short forests.
Is this society's fault? History shows - like science - that the most primitive societies pollute considerably less than us, partly because they lack the necessary technology to really mess up. Like the Indians people were within the Eskimo culture used to using everything they caught without wasting anything.
Svar #3
11. januar 2009 af katja200 (Slettet)
Tusind tak til jer begge.. det var nogle drilske sætninger.. . : (
Svar #4
11. januar 2009 af Erik Morsing (Slettet)
#1
"But there have been great damages in the progresses and in the human’s greediness name."
Jeg ville måske hellere bruge: In the "greediness of human society", men måske er det mere moderne at bruge det andet
Svar #5
11. januar 2009 af katja200 (Slettet)
men kan man godt sige progresses, da progress er sg..???
Svar #6
11. januar 2009 af Heart OfAurora (Slettet)
Jeg mener bestemt ikke, man må sige "THE nature", men at det blot ville hedde "Nature - the cheap dirt", hvis du vil have den helt direkte oversættelse.
Desuden ville det vist også hedde: "Like the Indians, people in the Eskimo society were used to using everything they caught, without letting anything go to waste."
Svar #7
11. januar 2009 af katja200 (Slettet)
Tak Heart OFA..,, jeg mener også at skal være uden "The nature.. da det ikke er en bestemt natur, men naturen i helhed..
Skriv et svar til: Bare et par sætninger!!! haster!
Du skal være logget ind, for at skrive et svar til dette spørgsmål. Klik her for at logge ind.
Har du ikke en bruger på Studieportalen.dk?
Klik her for at oprette en bruger.