Andre fag
Hjælp med at rette min oversættelse 2
01. marts 2007 af
Lamia (Slettet)
I begyndelsen af 1996 blev offentligheden stærkt opskræmt over en nyhed om, at ti yngre mennesker i Storbritannien var døde af en sygdom, som muligvis kunne være overført via kød fra kvæg med kogalskab. Reaktionerne kom prompte: forbud i EU mod import af britisk oksekød og en beslutning om at nedslagte millioner af køer i Storbritannien. Både organisatorisk og økonomisk er det en kæmpeopgave: man regner med at skulle nedslagte ca. 15.000 køer om ugen, men problemet er, at det nedslagtede kvæg skal brændes, og der er ikke i øjeblikket tilstrækkeligt mange forbrændingsanlæg i landet til at løse den opgave. Og hvem skal betale den samlede regning, som man vurderer til at blive på ca. 20 – 30 milliarder danske kroner? EU træder til med støtte, men hvor meget Storbritannien selv må udrede, er ikke nemt at beslutte i EU regi. Storbritannien er kendt for sin modstand mod selv at yde til EU; skal den enkelte britiske skatteborger nu straffes for det? Eller skal EU vise større solidaritet med Storbritannien, end briterne indtil nu har vist resten af EU?
In the beginning of 1996, the public became highly alarmed over news about ten years younger people in Great Britain had died from a disease, which perhaps could have been transferred through meet from cattle with mad cow disease. The reactions came prompt: ban in the EU against import of British beef and a decision about slaughtering millions of cows in Great Britain. Both organizational and economical they are a huge task: It is calculated that about 15.000 cows a week, but the problem is that the slaughtered cattle will be burned, and there’s not for the moment enough incineration plants in the country to solve this problem. And who will pay the total bill, which it’s evaluated to reach the 20-30 billion Danish crowns? The EU is giving support, but how much Great Britain must investigate, is not easy to decide in the EU framework. Great Britain is known for her opposition to himself to deliver to the EU. Should each British----now get punished because of that? Or should The EU show more solidarity with Great Britain, as compared to the British solidarity with the EU.
Tak på forhånd!
In the beginning of 1996, the public became highly alarmed over news about ten years younger people in Great Britain had died from a disease, which perhaps could have been transferred through meet from cattle with mad cow disease. The reactions came prompt: ban in the EU against import of British beef and a decision about slaughtering millions of cows in Great Britain. Both organizational and economical they are a huge task: It is calculated that about 15.000 cows a week, but the problem is that the slaughtered cattle will be burned, and there’s not for the moment enough incineration plants in the country to solve this problem. And who will pay the total bill, which it’s evaluated to reach the 20-30 billion Danish crowns? The EU is giving support, but how much Great Britain must investigate, is not easy to decide in the EU framework. Great Britain is known for her opposition to himself to deliver to the EU. Should each British----now get punished because of that? Or should The EU show more solidarity with Great Britain, as compared to the British solidarity with the EU.
Tak på forhånd!
Skriv et svar til: Hjælp med at rette min oversættelse 2
Du skal være logget ind, for at skrive et svar til dette spørgsmål. Klik her for at logge ind.
Har du ikke en bruger på Studieportalen.dk?
Klik her for at oprette en bruger.
