Engelsk
rettelse af oversættelse
20. september 2003 af
Alica (Slettet)
Kunne jeg få en til at kigge på min engelsk oversættelse. Er ik lige en ørn til det, men har alligevel forsøgt mit bedste.
A Dignified Death?
The humans are the Lord of Creation, but does it means that we can use the animals in our experiments and take their lives to project our own?
We use dogs, cats rabbits, horses, and mousses in our scientific experiments to find reasons to diseases, but we also do it to find out for instance that the artificial colouring in our food is dangerous, or to see if the lovely soaps and perfumes, which makes us attractive, are harmful.
In some experiment we pour shampoo in the eyes of rabbits to see, what happen. If their eyes fall out, there is something wrong with the product.
In other experiments we gives very hungry rats cosmetic for breakfast. If they don’t die, then the child who has eat its mothers lipstick also survive.
We can learn a lot of our experiments with animals, right?
But is it all right to uses millions of animals to our experiments, and isn’t there other opportunities?
En værdig død?
Mennesket er skabningens herre, men betyder det, at vikan bruge dyrene i vores eksperimenter og tage deres liv for at beskytte vores eget?
Vi bruger hunde, katte, kaniner, heste og mus i videnskabelige forsøg for at finde årsager til sygdomme, men vi gør det også for at finde ud af, om f.eks. de kunstige farvestoffer i maden er farlige, eller for at se, om de dejlige sæber og parfumer, som gør os tiltrækkende, er skadelige.
I nogle forsøg hælder vi shampoo i øjnene på kaniner for at se, hvad der sker. Hvis deres øjne falder ud, er der noget galt med produktet.
I andre forsøg giver vi meget sultne rotter kosmetik til morgenmad. Hvis de ikke død, vi det barn, som har spist sin mors læbestik, også overleve.
Vi kan lære meget af vores eksperimenter med dyr, ikke sandt?
Men er det i orden at bruge millioner af dyr i vores forsøg, og er der ikke andre muligheder?
A Dignified Death?
The humans are the Lord of Creation, but does it means that we can use the animals in our experiments and take their lives to project our own?
We use dogs, cats rabbits, horses, and mousses in our scientific experiments to find reasons to diseases, but we also do it to find out for instance that the artificial colouring in our food is dangerous, or to see if the lovely soaps and perfumes, which makes us attractive, are harmful.
In some experiment we pour shampoo in the eyes of rabbits to see, what happen. If their eyes fall out, there is something wrong with the product.
In other experiments we gives very hungry rats cosmetic for breakfast. If they don’t die, then the child who has eat its mothers lipstick also survive.
We can learn a lot of our experiments with animals, right?
But is it all right to uses millions of animals to our experiments, and isn’t there other opportunities?
En værdig død?
Mennesket er skabningens herre, men betyder det, at vikan bruge dyrene i vores eksperimenter og tage deres liv for at beskytte vores eget?
Vi bruger hunde, katte, kaniner, heste og mus i videnskabelige forsøg for at finde årsager til sygdomme, men vi gør det også for at finde ud af, om f.eks. de kunstige farvestoffer i maden er farlige, eller for at se, om de dejlige sæber og parfumer, som gør os tiltrækkende, er skadelige.
I nogle forsøg hælder vi shampoo i øjnene på kaniner for at se, hvad der sker. Hvis deres øjne falder ud, er der noget galt med produktet.
I andre forsøg giver vi meget sultne rotter kosmetik til morgenmad. Hvis de ikke død, vi det barn, som har spist sin mors læbestik, også overleve.
Vi kan lære meget af vores eksperimenter med dyr, ikke sandt?
Men er det i orden at bruge millioner af dyr i vores forsøg, og er der ikke andre muligheder?
Svar #1
20. september 2003 af darkseer (Slettet)
http://www.studi.dk/forum/index.php?vis=viewmsg&id=10513
:-D ..
:-D ..
Svar #3
20. september 2003 af SP anonym (Slettet)
vi tar det som det kommer derned af. kig rigtig godt efter, for jeg har også rettet kommaer! du skal også, før du skriver opgaven, opgøre med digselv om du vil skrive med eller uden sammentrækninger (ex: it is ELLER it's) du må ikke skifte mellem disse da det giver et underligt udseende af opgavens helhed. det er nu ikke for at blære mig, men jeg er ret ret god til engelsk, så de ting du finder, at jeg har rettet, er helt sikkert rigtige.. værsågod! hvis du har andre spørgsmål kan du jo maile:
The humans are Lord of Creation, but does it mean that we can use animals in experiments and take their lives to project our own?
We use dogs, cats rabbits, horses, and moice in our scientific experiments to find cures for diseases ect, but we also do it to find out, for instance, that the artificial colouring in our food are dangerous. Or to see if the lovely soaps and perfumes, which makes us attractive, are harmful.
In some experiments we pour shampoo in the eyes of rabbits to see what happen. If their eyes fall out, there is something wrong with the product.
In other experiments we give very hungry rats cosmetic for breakfast. If they do not die, then the child who has eaten her or his mothers lipstick, also will survive.
We can learn a lot from our experiments with animals, right?
But is it all right to use millions of animals to our experiments, and is there not there other opportunities?
The humans are Lord of Creation, but does it mean that we can use animals in experiments and take their lives to project our own?
We use dogs, cats rabbits, horses, and moice in our scientific experiments to find cures for diseases ect, but we also do it to find out, for instance, that the artificial colouring in our food are dangerous. Or to see if the lovely soaps and perfumes, which makes us attractive, are harmful.
In some experiments we pour shampoo in the eyes of rabbits to see what happen. If their eyes fall out, there is something wrong with the product.
In other experiments we give very hungry rats cosmetic for breakfast. If they do not die, then the child who has eaten her or his mothers lipstick, also will survive.
We can learn a lot from our experiments with animals, right?
But is it all right to use millions of animals to our experiments, and is there not there other opportunities?
Skriv et svar til: rettelse af oversættelse
Du skal være logget ind, for at skrive et svar til dette spørgsmål. Klik her for at logge ind.
Har du ikke en bruger på Studieportalen.dk?
Klik her for at oprette en bruger.