Engelsk
Nem rettelse
21. marts 2006 af
figaro8 (Slettet)
nogle rarer mennekser, som lige ville rette min lille tekst her...
How to tell a winner?
Concerning the poem, tells by the difference between a winner and a loser. I think the poem, transforms the loser, to “the bad guy”, who is egoistic, self-centred, and focused on promises to him or herself. The poem tells about, how the loser, because of his/her down trip, becomes irresponsible and critical, to other people, and things, and with that, reject his/her status and honesty further, than it is in advance. The winner, on the other hand, is being mentioned as a “hero”, who in spite of his/her victory, still has energy, and power, to spread out his/her happiness, to other people, and with that, transfer allot of pleasure to people. I think it has something to do with, that the winners always are getting allot of attention, and therefore, will the losers nearly always be isolating, in the winners veil of success. The winner will always try, to improve him/her self, especially now, when he/she knows, that allot of people are behind him/her, and will always fully support him/her in his/her efforts to improve. While the loser doesn’t wants to develop him/her self, and if someone are better than themselves, they will go try make people looks bad, and idiotic. And then is the winner also more social presented, than the loser, understanding in the way, that the winner surely would like to here, and be teaching by others, while the loser, just want to be, as him/her always has been. But why can’t we then just not live, and adjust our brains, after the message : loss and win, with the same mind? I think the reason for this is, that if people just are careless about, if they win or not, there wouldn’t be any point of having a winner and loser. Moreover you will not develop you skill’s, because “why should I develop my self, when the result doesn’t matter”. But at the same time, if you have developed you self to much, you will begin, just to expect that you always will win, and therefore if you loss, you’ll be angry on you self and others, and also loss the feeling for development, when “ why should I develop my self, when I still not are going to win” now will be reality. You can say, that this very negative feeling, the loser is advance, is the way, for the loser, to “survive” his/her inferiority. While the winner, who doesn’t go around with these troubles, like the loser, constant is occupied searching for being better. The question is then, if the winner, because of his/her occupation, will be the “loser”, and the loser, because of his/her survival, will be the “winner”.
How to tell a winner?
Concerning the poem, tells by the difference between a winner and a loser. I think the poem, transforms the loser, to “the bad guy”, who is egoistic, self-centred, and focused on promises to him or herself. The poem tells about, how the loser, because of his/her down trip, becomes irresponsible and critical, to other people, and things, and with that, reject his/her status and honesty further, than it is in advance. The winner, on the other hand, is being mentioned as a “hero”, who in spite of his/her victory, still has energy, and power, to spread out his/her happiness, to other people, and with that, transfer allot of pleasure to people. I think it has something to do with, that the winners always are getting allot of attention, and therefore, will the losers nearly always be isolating, in the winners veil of success. The winner will always try, to improve him/her self, especially now, when he/she knows, that allot of people are behind him/her, and will always fully support him/her in his/her efforts to improve. While the loser doesn’t wants to develop him/her self, and if someone are better than themselves, they will go try make people looks bad, and idiotic. And then is the winner also more social presented, than the loser, understanding in the way, that the winner surely would like to here, and be teaching by others, while the loser, just want to be, as him/her always has been. But why can’t we then just not live, and adjust our brains, after the message : loss and win, with the same mind? I think the reason for this is, that if people just are careless about, if they win or not, there wouldn’t be any point of having a winner and loser. Moreover you will not develop you skill’s, because “why should I develop my self, when the result doesn’t matter”. But at the same time, if you have developed you self to much, you will begin, just to expect that you always will win, and therefore if you loss, you’ll be angry on you self and others, and also loss the feeling for development, when “ why should I develop my self, when I still not are going to win” now will be reality. You can say, that this very negative feeling, the loser is advance, is the way, for the loser, to “survive” his/her inferiority. While the winner, who doesn’t go around with these troubles, like the loser, constant is occupied searching for being better. The question is then, if the winner, because of his/her occupation, will be the “loser”, and the loser, because of his/her survival, will be the “winner”.
Svar #1
21. marts 2006 af mariehøne (Slettet)
Jeg tror du får svar, hvis du ville undlade at poste en halv stil herinde.. det er simpelthen for uoverskueligt.. I stedet bør du bare poste de dele, du er i tvivl om..
Vh Marie
Vh Marie
Svar #4
21. marts 2006 af figaro8 (Slettet)
kom nu en eller anden klog engelsk ekspert, jeg vil virkelig gerne se jeres/dine rettelser...
Svar #6
21. marts 2006 af jensappel (Slettet)
Concerning the poem, it tells the difference between a winner and a loser. I think the poem transforms the loser to “the bad guy”, who is egoistic, self-centred and focused on promises to him- or herself. The poem tells how the loser, because of his/her down trip (fordanskning -> find et andet udtryk!) , becomes irresponsible and critical to other people and things, and thereby rejects his/her status and honesty further, than it is in advance. The winner, on the other hand, is being mentioned as a “hero” who in spite of his/her victory, still has energy and power, to spread out his/her happiness to other people, and thereby transfer allot of pleasure to people. I think it is because the winners always get all the attention, that the losers often becomes isolated in the winners veil of success. The winner will always try to improve him- or herself, especially now, when he/she knows that a lot of people are supporting him/her, and always will do in his/hers efforts to improve. While the loser doesn’t want to develop him/her self, and if someone are better than them, they will1 try to make people look bad and idiotic. And then the winner is also more social presented than the loser, understood in the way that the winner surely would like to here and to be teached by others, while the loser just want to be as he/she always has been. But why can’t we just live and adjust our brains after the message : lose and win with the same mind? (øh.. du tænker for meget dansk.) I think the reason for this is that if people just are careless if they win or not, there wouldn’t be any point in having a winner and a loser. Moreover you will not develop you skills, because “why should I develop my self, when the result doesn’t matter”. But if you have developed yourself too much, you will begin to expect that you always will win. If you lose you will then be angry with yourself and others and also lose the feeling for development. when “ why should I develop myself when I am still not going to win?” now will be reality.(forstår ikke hvad du mener?) You can say, that the loser's very negative attitude is the way, that the loser is “surviving” his/her inferiority. While the winner, who doesn’t have these problems, constantly is occupied trying to become better. The question is then, if the winner, because of his/her occupation, will be the “loser”, and the loser, because of his/her survival, will be the “winner”.
---------
ok, det gik lidt hurtigt, men håber du kan bruge noget af det.
---------
ok, det gik lidt hurtigt, men håber du kan bruge noget af det.
Skriv et svar til: Nem rettelse
Du skal være logget ind, for at skrive et svar til dette spørgsmål. Klik her for at logge ind.
Har du ikke en bruger på Studieportalen.dk?
Klik her for at oprette en bruger.
