rettes

- "married" og ikke "marry" -> Husk at bøje

- "two" og ikke "to" -> Regner med hun har 2 børn

- "lived" og ikke "live" -> Husk bøjning igen!

- "got an offer" og ikke "gets the offer" -> Det er noget hun har fået, ikke sandt. Ergo - husk bøjning.

- "it" og ikke "its" -> Its er en genitiv for it.

- "with" og ikke "whit" -> Brug ordbog

- "At the beginning" og ikke "In the start"

- "Has" og ikke "have" -> Husk kongruens. Det er 3. person singularis, ergo has.

- Jeg ville nok sige "a lot" i stedet for "lots"

- "At the beginning" og ikke "In the start" -> Samme som sidst

- "Dorte Verner enjoys" og ikke "enjoy DV." -> Oftest subjekt før verbum + kongruens

"The feeling of freedom" og ikke "the feeling to be free"

- "end Dorte Werner had it" -> Jeg forstår ikke hvad du mener .> brug ordbog....







Jeg synes selv du skal kigge på resten + de fejl jeg ikke har rettet i første afdeling husk.

1. with og ikke whit når du mener med

2. -s på substantiver i 3. person singularis

3. Husk at bøje...



Håber det hjalp, ret og læg evt. teksten ud igen...


Charlotte

Summary of “Når det lette liv bliver en pestilens”
Dorte Werner is 33 years old and is MARRIED and have TWO kids. In Denmark she was a career women and LIVED well. Then she gets (LÆG MÆRKE TIL TIDEN... ) AN offer to come to China in Hong Kong. Dorte Werner thinks that IT will be nice WITH a breathing space. In Hong Kong she lives a life WITH a maid and she is just a housewife. In the BEGINNING Dorte Werner HAS A LOT of things to do and she thinks that she achieveS A LOT every day. In the BEGINNING Dorte Werner ENJOYS the feeling og FREEDOM but in the endING Dorte Werner had it because she could be WITH the kids all the time, then she feelS she is a bad mom. In the endING the freedom was a problem. Dorte Werner feelS INFERIOR because for her it WAS humiliating that she DID not work for her own money and Dorte Werner'S feeling of inferiority became strengthened because the environment was very male chauvinist. In the endING she missES some kind of contents in her weekday. She filled it out WITH a half-time job as consul general in Hong Kong.

Ved ikke lige om jeg har fået det hele med, eller hvorvidt det er korrekt rettet, da der er flere steder jeg ikke helt er sikker på hvad du mener.
Men husk:

At tjekke tiden i dit summary...

The end = Selve ordet slut, altså hvad der sker efter slutningen.

The ending: Slutningen, altså forløbet af den sidste del i en historie.

WITH ikke WHIT

Bøjning af 3. pers. singularis.

Aldrig komma foran that

Der er mange af fejlene, der er påpeget og egentlig ikke behøver rettelse, men da det er et referat og ikke en oversættelse har jeg lige taget friheden og lavet noget af din sætningskonstruktion og formuleringer om, da nogle af dem lyder lidt kludrede:

Summary of "Når det lette liv bliver en pestilens"

Dorte Werner is a 33-year-old married woman with two kids. When she lived in Denmark, she was a career woman and lived happily.

However, she then gets an offer to come to Hong Kong, China. Dorte Werner thinks that it will be nice with some breathing space. In Hong Kong, she lives a life with a maid and is just a housewife.

In the beginning she has a lot of things to do and thinks that she achieves a lot every day. In the beginning, Dorte enjoys feeling free but ends up having had enough because she cannot be with the kids all the time. This makes her feel she is a bad mom.

In the end, the freedoms turns out to be a problem. Dorte Werner is angry because its humiliating to her to work for her own money. Dorte's angry feelings are not weakened by her feelings toward her environment, which is influenced by male chauvinists.

All in all, she misses content and mening in her life. A meaning that is given by her work as Consul General in Hong Kong.

having had enough skal bare være having enough. Freedoms skal bare være freedom. Jeg ville også slette humiltiating to her, da vi ved at indlede sætningen med Dorthe jo egentlig underforstået ved at det er hende der har den følelse. Mening skal være meaning.