Engelsk
rettelse af oversættelse....!!!
14. marts 2004 af
Alica (Slettet)
hejsa, har lige skrevet en oversættelse, ville være enormt glad hvis nogen ville kigge den igennem for grove fejl:)
All history books are about men and men’s decisions, however the half world have always been women.
How did they live, what did they do, which thoughts did they have, what did they think about life? These are some of the things, which female research workers are start to be interested in.
One of them says: “When I was in school, women was described as passive and reactionaries. But I couldn’t accept this prejudice. Either, that the women was forgotten. So, therefore I now works with this new history writing.
Of course I think the history should concern about human and not just about women. But right now it’s important to be concentrated about women, because they have been completely neglected. That’s why it’s very important to criticise the archaic history books written by men about men.
danske version:
Alle historiebøger handler om mænd og mænds beslutninger, og dog har den halve verden altid været kvinder.
Hvordan levede de, hvad lavede de, hvilke tanker havde de, hvad syntes de om livet? Dette er nogle af de ting, som kvindelige forskere er begyndt at interessere sig for.
En af dem siger: "Da jeg gik i skole, blev kvinderne beskrevet som passive og reaktionære. Men jeg kunne ikke acceptere denne fordom. Heller ikke, at kvinderne blev glemt. Så derfor arbejder jeg nu med denne nye historieskrivning.
Selvfølgelig mener jeg, at historien bør handle om mennesker og ikke kun om kvinder. Men lige nu er det meget vigtigt at koncentrere sig om kvinder, fordi de har været fuldstændig forsømt. Derfor er det meget vigtigt at kritisere de gammeldags historiebøger, skrevet af mænd om mænd.
All history books are about men and men’s decisions, however the half world have always been women.
How did they live, what did they do, which thoughts did they have, what did they think about life? These are some of the things, which female research workers are start to be interested in.
One of them says: “When I was in school, women was described as passive and reactionaries. But I couldn’t accept this prejudice. Either, that the women was forgotten. So, therefore I now works with this new history writing.
Of course I think the history should concern about human and not just about women. But right now it’s important to be concentrated about women, because they have been completely neglected. That’s why it’s very important to criticise the archaic history books written by men about men.
danske version:
Alle historiebøger handler om mænd og mænds beslutninger, og dog har den halve verden altid været kvinder.
Hvordan levede de, hvad lavede de, hvilke tanker havde de, hvad syntes de om livet? Dette er nogle af de ting, som kvindelige forskere er begyndt at interessere sig for.
En af dem siger: "Da jeg gik i skole, blev kvinderne beskrevet som passive og reaktionære. Men jeg kunne ikke acceptere denne fordom. Heller ikke, at kvinderne blev glemt. Så derfor arbejder jeg nu med denne nye historieskrivning.
Selvfølgelig mener jeg, at historien bør handle om mennesker og ikke kun om kvinder. Men lige nu er det meget vigtigt at koncentrere sig om kvinder, fordi de har været fuldstændig forsømt. Derfor er det meget vigtigt at kritisere de gammeldags historiebøger, skrevet af mænd om mænd.
Svar #1
14. marts 2004 af Symmanine (Slettet)
Det ser meget fornuftigt ud, har dog lige et par forslag til justeringer:
All history books are about men and men’s decisions. However, half the world have always been women.
How did they live, what did they do, which thoughts did they have, what did they think about life? These are some of the issues, which female research workers are starting to be interested in.
One of them says: “When I was in school, women was described as being passive and as reactionaries. But I could not accept this prejudice. Neither, that women was forgotten. Therefore, I now work with this new history writing.
Naturally, I think history should be about humanity and not just about women. But right now it is important to be pay a lot of attention to women, because they have been completely neglected. That is why, it is very important to criticise the old-fashioned history books, written by men about men.
*Historien (verdenshistorien) skal der ikke artikel foran på engelsk. History, ikke The History - dette ville blive opfattet som en specific historie, hvilket ikke er tilfældet i denne sammenhæng.
*Det samme med "kvinderne" med mindre der er tale om en helt bestemt gruppe af kvinder, her er det kvinder i al almindelighed.
*Måske er det bare mig, men jeg er altså ikke vild med sammenskrivninger i formelt engelsk. It is - og ikke it's - could not og ikke couldn't.
All history books are about men and men’s decisions. However, half the world have always been women.
How did they live, what did they do, which thoughts did they have, what did they think about life? These are some of the issues, which female research workers are starting to be interested in.
One of them says: “When I was in school, women was described as being passive and as reactionaries. But I could not accept this prejudice. Neither, that women was forgotten. Therefore, I now work with this new history writing.
Naturally, I think history should be about humanity and not just about women. But right now it is important to be pay a lot of attention to women, because they have been completely neglected. That is why, it is very important to criticise the old-fashioned history books, written by men about men.
*Historien (verdenshistorien) skal der ikke artikel foran på engelsk. History, ikke The History - dette ville blive opfattet som en specific historie, hvilket ikke er tilfældet i denne sammenhæng.
*Det samme med "kvinderne" med mindre der er tale om en helt bestemt gruppe af kvinder, her er det kvinder i al almindelighed.
*Måske er det bare mig, men jeg er altså ikke vild med sammenskrivninger i formelt engelsk. It is - og ikke it's - could not og ikke couldn't.
Svar #2
15. marts 2004 af Alica (Slettet)
tak skal du ha':)
jeg har taget dine råd til mig...
forresten glemte lige at få overskriften med: "Hvorfor har historien altid glemt kvinderne?"
"Why had women always been forgot by history?"
er det en acceptabelt oversættelse??
jeg har taget dine råd til mig...
forresten glemte lige at få overskriften med: "Hvorfor har historien altid glemt kvinderne?"
"Why had women always been forgot by history?"
er det en acceptabelt oversættelse??
Skriv et svar til: rettelse af oversættelse....!!!
Du skal være logget ind, for at skrive et svar til dette spørgsmål. Klik her for at logge ind.
Har du ikke en bruger på Studieportalen.dk?
Klik her for at oprette en bruger.