Hjælp til rettelse af skriftlig opgave

Jeg har brug for hjælp til rettelser af min stil om forholdet mellem Kina og Tibet. Håber I vil hjælpe:


Tibet – and the conflict with China


Tibet is a region placed in the Central Asia. It lies more than 4000 metres over the sea level and is called “the roof of the world” because of that.
There are many stories about the country before Christ but the first historical written articles were founded in the 7th century. At that time Tibet was a superpower that had the control of China, Nepal, India and Pakistan and the leading production of armour.
Two hundred years later the whole empire passed by. A Buddhist murdered King Langdarma and because of the disagreement about which one had to lead the state Tibet was split into a number of small states.
In this period the Mongol rulers had the all power of the world and they used a very simple technique to invade new countries: to confess the the religion in these. From 1264 to 1268 Tibet was attached to Mongol administration but the nation had a kind of self administration because the Tibetan llamas acted as religious teachers for the Mon-gols.
Khubilai Khan and the other Mongol rulers were on the same emperors of China. The-refore the Chinese government maintains today that Tibet at this point stayed as a part of China. Still the situation was that the Mongol control of Tibet remained separate from the administration of China.
First in 1642 the fifth managed Dalai Lama got the full control of Tibet by allying itself with the Mongol leader Gushri Khan in order to jail the regent.
For the next 80 years Tibet was led by the Buddhism. But in 1720 Chinese soldiers from the Qing-dynasty Tibet attacked. They meant that the Tibetan leader Dalai Lama had to divide the power with them.
The soldiers proved right, but were retorted again in 1912 where the Tibetans were in a position to neutralize the Chinese army. In that way fell the Yuan- and Qing-dynasty and the thirteenth Dalai Lama declared Tibet's independence a year after.
At a subsequent meeting in India with people from Great Britain and China Tibet's future was discussed without a true result. One agreed that China had suzerainty in the country, but China never signed the convention because of disagreement about the border distribution between Tibet and China.
Tibet was really independent now but at the same time by the US and Great Britain subdued Chinese suzerainty. They didn't dare to acknowledge Tibet's independence directly because it could provoke China to an obsession of the country and Tibet found it necessary to enter an alliance with Mongolia.
The doubt about the Chinese strategy got its redemption in 1949 where the commu-nists came to the power in China. After this Tibet chose to expel the Chinese represent-tatives from the capital Lhasa but that one didn't do wisely in. Mao intended to free Tibet. Already the year after the squads started could the liberation of Tibet that in the real world was an obsession begins. That led to that Dalai Lama had to run away to India in 1959 together with a part of his government to live at exile.
Since then has executions, state of emergencies, demonstrations and rejections from China got a result of that Tibet are still a part of China to this very day.

The conflict between China and Tibet may be difficult to understand. It's as a matter of fact not just about China's right to have Tibet but also about nationalism, imperialism and what it implies. And to a high degree what you ethically can afford.
Neither China nor Tibet has opinion-, utterance-, press-, or freedom of assembly. That has meant that China in the course of time has been able to turn away organizations like the UN and Amnesty International who has put pressures on getting the Chinese regime to see clear on the Human Rights Charta. They could in order to that use Tibet as a kind of defence in order to be able to cover the negative sight from the west against the country.
Another thing you can be surprised over is who Mao would free the Tibetans from.
The explanation is to be found in connection with Dalai Lama's yearly speech on March 10. where he encourages the Chinese authorities a peaceful solution with Tibet. After-wards the Tibetans ask a prayer to be freed from China.
But China sits with the good cards. First of all Tibet lies high over the seas when we talk about mountainous regions it may be often problematic to say which chain belongs which country. We are out at a no man's land. In addition China has been never sym-pathetic in a weapon war with somebody before and you'll therefore be able to say that Tibet was a necessity to manage to win its borders.
Where the development carries over is not known but China's point of view doesn't break in direction off that Tibet can get its desired autonomy. The last years China has experienced a so big financial growth that they have become the world's seventh-biggest finances.
With the next Olympic Games in Beijing next year you get aimed to focus on China and they will get more capital to improve the infrastructure. At the same time the nation has started an urbanization in Tibet and you can imagine that the Chinese in that context will throw a colored scrap over the attitude to the country.
The focus will turn in a moment and the conflict and disagreement will continue in the next many years of the future.