Engelsk
hjælp til rettelse af sprog og gramma, afleveres imorgen :S
20. december 2007 af
Nathi (Slettet)
Formålet er at analysere Martin L. Kings taler som leder af Borgerrettighedsbevægelsen.
The purpose of this paper is to analyse MLK’s speeches when he was the leader of the civil rights movement.
Hensigten er at se på, om MLK ideologi og holdning ændrer sig i perioden, og om ”non-violence” metoden var effektiv til at forbedre de sortes forhold.
The purpose (of) is to see if MLK’s ideology and attitude is changing in the period, and if the “non-violence” method was effective to improve the conditions for the black people.
Ud fra en analyse og sammenligning af MLKs taler fra perioden 1957-68, vurderes, om der skete en udvikling.
Based on an analysis and a comparison of MLK’s speeches from the period of 1957 to 1968, evaluates if there has happened a development.
Hans ”non-violence” ideologi, som introduceres i første tale, ændres ikke.
His ”non-violence” ideology, which introduces in the first speech, did not change.
Derimod ændrer indholdet i talerne sig fra i starten at være filosofisk til at blive mere handlingsrettet og beskæftige sig med samfundsmæssige problemer over hele verden.
On the other hand changes the contents in the speeches from being philosophical to be more focused on actions and dealing with the social problems all over the world.
Hele vejen igennem har han dog referencer til biblen som argument for egne holdninger.
The whole way through all three speeches, does he use/ make use of the bible as an argument to/of his own attitudes/stance
Det, der gør talerne til noget særligt, er imidlertid retorikken med bl.a. metaforer og gentagelser.
What makes the speeches so special, is the rhetoric with among some of them the metaphors and the repetitions.
Herefter diskuteres moral og nytte med inddragelse af to andre borgerrettighedsbevægelser, ”The Black Panther Party” og Malcolm X, som begge havde voldsbaseret ideologier.
After this discusses/debates and effectiveness with involvement of two other civil rights movements “The Black Panther Party” and Malcolm X who(m) both had an ideology based on violence.
MLK vinder på moralen, mens de to andre vinder på effektiviteten.
MLK win on the moral, while the two others win on effectiveness
Min vurdering er at MLKs drøm er gået i opfyldelse idet de sorte har fået forbedret deres vilkår, men at der stadig er mange økonomiske, sociale og racemæssige problemer i USA.
My evaluation is that MLK’s dream came true in the black society, where he has improved theirs conditions of life, but there is still a lot of financial, social and racist problems in the USA.
The purpose of this paper is to analyse MLK’s speeches when he was the leader of the civil rights movement.
Hensigten er at se på, om MLK ideologi og holdning ændrer sig i perioden, og om ”non-violence” metoden var effektiv til at forbedre de sortes forhold.
The purpose (of) is to see if MLK’s ideology and attitude is changing in the period, and if the “non-violence” method was effective to improve the conditions for the black people.
Ud fra en analyse og sammenligning af MLKs taler fra perioden 1957-68, vurderes, om der skete en udvikling.
Based on an analysis and a comparison of MLK’s speeches from the period of 1957 to 1968, evaluates if there has happened a development.
Hans ”non-violence” ideologi, som introduceres i første tale, ændres ikke.
His ”non-violence” ideology, which introduces in the first speech, did not change.
Derimod ændrer indholdet i talerne sig fra i starten at være filosofisk til at blive mere handlingsrettet og beskæftige sig med samfundsmæssige problemer over hele verden.
On the other hand changes the contents in the speeches from being philosophical to be more focused on actions and dealing with the social problems all over the world.
Hele vejen igennem har han dog referencer til biblen som argument for egne holdninger.
The whole way through all three speeches, does he use/ make use of the bible as an argument to/of his own attitudes/stance
Det, der gør talerne til noget særligt, er imidlertid retorikken med bl.a. metaforer og gentagelser.
What makes the speeches so special, is the rhetoric with among some of them the metaphors and the repetitions.
Herefter diskuteres moral og nytte med inddragelse af to andre borgerrettighedsbevægelser, ”The Black Panther Party” og Malcolm X, som begge havde voldsbaseret ideologier.
After this discusses/debates and effectiveness with involvement of two other civil rights movements “The Black Panther Party” and Malcolm X who(m) both had an ideology based on violence.
MLK vinder på moralen, mens de to andre vinder på effektiviteten.
MLK win on the moral, while the two others win on effectiveness
Min vurdering er at MLKs drøm er gået i opfyldelse idet de sorte har fået forbedret deres vilkår, men at der stadig er mange økonomiske, sociale og racemæssige problemer i USA.
My evaluation is that MLK’s dream came true in the black society, where he has improved theirs conditions of life, but there is still a lot of financial, social and racist problems in the USA.
Skriv et svar til: hjælp til rettelse af sprog og gramma, afleveres imorgen :S
Du skal være logget ind, for at skrive et svar til dette spørgsmål. Klik her for at logge ind.
Har du ikke en bruger på Studieportalen.dk?
Klik her for at oprette en bruger.