Engelsk
er der nogle der vil rette min oversættelse?
Er der nogle der vil rette min engelsk oversættelse? :;O
De fleste mennesker vil nok være enige i, at det er lykkedes for Golding at skrive en virkeligt spændende bog om den menneskelige natur. Selv om nogle måske vil mene, at det er en drengebog, han har skrevet, og at han har fundet meget inspiration hos andre forfattere, er der næppe tvivl om, at flertallet af hans læsere får en stor oplevelse af at læse bogen. Når man læser den, får man et klart indtryk af, at Golding hele tiden er klar over hvad han gør. På den ene side skriver han om drengene som individuelle personer og om deres oplevelser på deres øde ø; på den anden side udvikler disse individer sig ganske langsomt til at blive stereotyper. Vi genkender karaktertræk hos dem, som vi har læst eller hørt om tidligere, ja, vi kan måske genkende træk i os selv. Golding skifter helt bevidst mellem beskrivende, fortællende og reflekterende afsnit – og ganske ofte kan vi fornemme, at han pludselig selv træder frem for at understrege en særlig pointe. Så skifter sproget, da han meget naturligt benytter en anden måde at tænke på. En anden måde at udtrykke dette på er at sige, at Golding tager udgangspunkt i de konkrete oplevelser, drengene har på øen, men samtidig bruger dem til at levere et mere generelt budskab – noget generelt om den menneskelige natur, som nævnt ovenfor. Når man kommer længere ind i bogen, er det ikke vanskeligt at se alt dette. Ja, det bliver næsten sværere og sværere at blive ved med at læse bogen som blot en drengebog snarere end en bog for alle – og måske især for voksne. Det varer ikke længe, før man som læser har en klar fornemmelse af handlingen og af forholdet mellem de forskellige grupper og mellem de vigtigste personer. Alligevel er der god grund til at læse videre. Uanset hvad man tror og mener på dette tidspunkt, kan man se frem til at læse mange gruopvækkende ting i de næste kapitler.
SELVESTE OVERSÆTTELSEN:
Most people would probably agree that it has succeeded Golding to write a really interesting book about human nature. Although some might argue that it’s a boy book, he has written, and he has found much inspiration from other writers, there's little doubt that the majority of his readers have a great experience to read the book. When you read it, you get a clear impression that Golding constantly aware of what he does. On one way he writes about the boys as individuals and about their experiences on the desert island, on the other hand, these individuals develop very slowly to become stereotypes. We recognize traits of those whom we have read or heard about earlier, yes, we can perhaps identify features within ourselves. Golding switch consciously between descriptive, narrative and reflective sections - and quite often we can sense that he suddenly even come forward to emphasize a particular point. Then he change the language, since he naturally uses a different way of thinking. Another way of expressing this is to say that Golding is based on concrete experiences, boys on the island but also use them to provide a more general message - something generally about human nature, as mentioned above. When you get further into the book, it is not difficult to see all this. Yes, it is almost harder and harder to keep on reading the book as merely a boy book rather than a book for everyone - and perhaps especially for adults. It is not long before the reader has a clear sense of the plot and the relationship between the different groups and between the main characters. Yet there is good reason to read further. Whatever one thinks and believes at this point, you can look forward to reading many horrifying things in the next chapters.
Svar #1
04. oktober 2010 af Mundo (Slettet)
Most people would probably agree that Golding succeeded writing a really interesting book about human nature. Although some people might think that it’s a boy book (måske boy's book, er ikke sikker), he has written, and he has found much inspiration from other writers, there's hardly any doubt that the majority of his readers have a great experience reading the book. When you read it, you get a clear impression that Golding is constantly aware of what he does. On the one hand he writes about the boys as individuals and about their experiences on their desert island, on the other hand these individuals slowly develop into stereotypes. We recognize traits of those (with them?) which we have read or heard about earlier, yes, we can perhaps identify features (eller: character traits) within ourselves. Golding consciously switches between descriptive, narrative and reflective sections
- and quite often we can sense that suddenly he even stands out himself to emphasize a particular point. Then he changes the language, since he naturally uses a different way of thinking. Another way of expressing this is to say that Golding is based on the concrete experiences, the boys have on the island, but he also uses them to provide a more general message - something generally about human nature, as mentioned above. When you get further into the book, it is not difficult to see all this. Yes, it almost gets harder and harder to keep on reading the book as merely a boy book rather than a book for everyone - and perhaps especially for adults. It is not long before the reader has a clear sense of the plot and the relationship between the different groups and between the main characters. Yet there is good reason to continue reading. Whatever one thinks and believes at this point, you can look forward to reading many horrifying things in the next chapters.
Svar #2
04. oktober 2010 af Stygotius (Slettet)
Most people would probably agree that Golding succeeded in writing a really interesting book about human nature. Although some people might think that it’s a (boy book) (måske boy's book, er ikke sikker), he has written, and that he has found much inspiration from other writers, there's hardly any doubt that the majority of his readers have (a) great experience reading the book. When you read it(,) you get (a) the clear impression that Golding is constantly aware of what he is doing(es). On the one hand he writes about the boys as individuals and about their experiences on their desert island, on the other (hand) these individuals slowly develop into stereotypes. We recogni(z)se traits (of those) (with them?) which we have read or heard about earlier, (yes,) and we can perhaps even identify features (eller: character traits, -ja også godt) as those we have within ourselves. Golding (consciously) deliberately switches between descriptive, narrative and reflective sections
- (and q)Quite often we can sense that suddenly he even (stands out) comes forward himself to emphasize a particular point. (Then h)He now changes the language(,) since (he) naturally he now uses a different way of thinking. Another way of expressing this is to say that Golding's writing is based on the concrete experiences(,) which the boys have on the island, (but he also) and uses them to provide an overall (more general) message - something general(ly) about human nature, as mentioned above. When you get further into the book(,) it is not difficult to see all this. Yes, it (almost gets harder and) becomes increadingly hard(er) to keep on reading the book as merely a (boy) book for boys rather than a book for everyone - and perhaps especially for adults. It is not long before the reader has a clear sense of both the plot and the relationship between the different groups and also between the main characters. Yet there is good reason to continue reading. Whatever one thinks and believes at this point, (you can) one feels tempted to read on with anticipation (look forward to reading) to many horrifying things in the next chapters.
Skriv et svar til: er der nogle der vil rette min oversættelse?
Du skal være logget ind, for at skrive et svar til dette spørgsmål. Klik her for at logge ind.
Har du ikke en bruger på Studieportalen.dk?
Klik her for at oprette en bruger.