Engelsk
Engelsk rettelse
14. november 2003 af
SP anonym (Slettet)
Hey.. Er der ikke nogle, som lige vil være sød at rette den igennem. På forhånd tak.
på dansk:
JFK er titlen på Oliver Stones film om mordet på den amerikanske præsident i 1963, en kontroversiel film, som tegner til at blive årets mest omdiskuterede i USa. Samtidig med at historikere og andre sætter spørgsmåltegn ved teorierne om drabet på Kennedy, hævder filmen, at den anklagede , Lee Harvey Oswald, ikke begik mordet alene.
Stone indrømmer, at han er bange for filmens virkning i USA, og allerede inden den har haft premiere, er han blevet stærkt kritiseret for de teorier og påstande, filmen bygger på.
" Det interessante er, at de fleste mennesker længe har haft mistanke om, at sandheden aldrig er kommet frem, at den officielle forklaring den gang i tresserne bestemt ikke var den eneste sandsynlige og overbevisende"
I øvrigt har Stone gjort sig store anstrengelser for at blive den første på markedet med en Kennedy-film. Emnet er uhyre populært i Hollywood for tiden, og instruktører og producere bruger alle slags midler, mere eller mindre beskidte, for at komme først med deres version.
på Engelsk:
JFK is the title of Oliver Stone's film about the murder of American president in 1963, a controversial film, who shows signs of being the year's most discussed film in USa. At the same time historians and other call something in question about the murder of Kennedy, claims the film, that the charge, Lee Harvey Oswald not comitted the murder by himself.
Stone admits, that he is afraid for the film's consequences in USa, and already before it has had first performance, he is become heavily criticized for the theories and claims, that the film is based on.
"The interesting is, that most people for a long time have suspected, that the true never is disclosed, that the officially explanation that time in the sixties was certainly not the only likely and convincingly"
By the way Stone has done great efforts to be the first on the market with a Kennedy-film.
The subjekt is extrenely popular for the moment in Hollywood and instructors and directors use all kind of means, mere eller mindre durty, to be the first with their version.
Hey.. Er der ikke nogle, som lige vil være sød at rette den igennem. På forhånd tak.
på dansk:
JFK er titlen på Oliver Stones film om mordet på den amerikanske præsident i 1963, en kontroversiel film, som tegner til at blive årets mest omdiskuterede i USa. Samtidig med at historikere og andre sætter spørgsmåltegn ved teorierne om drabet på Kennedy, hævder filmen, at den anklagede , Lee Harvey Oswald, ikke begik mordet alene.
Stone indrømmer, at han er bange for filmens virkning i USA, og allerede inden den har haft premiere, er han blevet stærkt kritiseret for de teorier og påstande, filmen bygger på.
" Det interessante er, at de fleste mennesker længe har haft mistanke om, at sandheden aldrig er kommet frem, at den officielle forklaring den gang i tresserne bestemt ikke var den eneste sandsynlige og overbevisende"
I øvrigt har Stone gjort sig store anstrengelser for at blive den første på markedet med en Kennedy-film. Emnet er uhyre populært i Hollywood for tiden, og instruktører og producere bruger alle slags midler, mere eller mindre beskidte, for at komme først med deres version.
på Engelsk:
JFK is the title of Oliver Stone's film about the murder of American president in 1963, a controversial film, who shows signs of being the year's most discussed film in USa. At the same time historians and other call something in question about the murder of Kennedy, claims the film, that the charge, Lee Harvey Oswald not comitted the murder by himself.
Stone admits, that he is afraid for the film's consequences in USa, and already before it has had first performance, he is become heavily criticized for the theories and claims, that the film is based on.
"The interesting is, that most people for a long time have suspected, that the true never is disclosed, that the officially explanation that time in the sixties was certainly not the only likely and convincingly"
By the way Stone has done great efforts to be the first on the market with a Kennedy-film.
The subjekt is extrenely popular for the moment in Hollywood and instructors and directors use all kind of means, mere eller mindre durty, to be the first with their version.
Svar #1
14. november 2003 af Slacz Maci (Slettet)
jeg er ikke videre god til engelsk, men jeg vil mene at jeg har fået rettet en hel del fejl.. Det kan være det er en god ide at læse tingene igennem inden du smider dem her, for der var en hel del stavefejl og et par ord som du vidst nok godt kunne have slået op..
JFK is the title of Oliver Stone's movie about the murder of The American president in 1963. It's a controversial movie, which is shaping up to be this years most discussed movie in USA.
While historians and others are questioning the theories about the murder of Kennedy, the movie claims that the accused, Lee Harvey Oswald did not alone commit the murder.
Stone admits that he fears that the consequences of the movie in The States, and already before its first performance, he has been heavily criticized for the theories and allegations the movie is based on.
"The interesting thing is that most people for a long time have suspected that the truth never has never seen the light, and that the official explanation in the sixties certainly wasn’t the only plausible and convincingly"
Furthermore Stone has done great efforts to be the first on the market with a Kennedy-film.
The subject is extremely popular at the moment in Hollywood and instructors and directors use all kinds of means, more or less dirty, to be the first with their version.
PS: Film – at filme noget
Movie – én film
Og ALDRIG komma foran “that”
.. Og jeg har sikkert selv lavet nogle fejl, men jeg har rettet flere :)
-Slacz-
JFK is the title of Oliver Stone's movie about the murder of The American president in 1963. It's a controversial movie, which is shaping up to be this years most discussed movie in USA.
While historians and others are questioning the theories about the murder of Kennedy, the movie claims that the accused, Lee Harvey Oswald did not alone commit the murder.
Stone admits that he fears that the consequences of the movie in The States, and already before its first performance, he has been heavily criticized for the theories and allegations the movie is based on.
"The interesting thing is that most people for a long time have suspected that the truth never has never seen the light, and that the official explanation in the sixties certainly wasn’t the only plausible and convincingly"
Furthermore Stone has done great efforts to be the first on the market with a Kennedy-film.
The subject is extremely popular at the moment in Hollywood and instructors and directors use all kinds of means, more or less dirty, to be the first with their version.
PS: Film – at filme noget
Movie – én film
Og ALDRIG komma foran “that”
.. Og jeg har sikkert selv lavet nogle fejl, men jeg har rettet flere :)
-Slacz-
Svar #2
15. november 2003 af SP anonym (Slettet)
JFK is the name of Oliver Stone's movie about the murder of the American president in 1963. A controverial movie, which is going to be this year's most discussed movie in USA.
While historians and others question the therories about Kennedy's murder, the movie maintains that the accussed, Lee Harvey Oswald, did not commit the murder alone.
Stone admits he fears the consequences of the movie in USA, and even before it aired for the first time, he has been heavily criticised for the theories and thoughts the movie is based on.
"Interestingly, most people have long suspected that the truth has been kept secret, and that the official statement from the 60s certainly was not the only probable and convincing"
By the way, Stone has put some great efforts into being the first one on the market with a movie about Kennedy.
Currently, the subjects enjoys great popularity in Hollywood, and directors and producers use any - more or less dirty - available means to be the first with their version.
While historians and others question the therories about Kennedy's murder, the movie maintains that the accussed, Lee Harvey Oswald, did not commit the murder alone.
Stone admits he fears the consequences of the movie in USA, and even before it aired for the first time, he has been heavily criticised for the theories and thoughts the movie is based on.
"Interestingly, most people have long suspected that the truth has been kept secret, and that the official statement from the 60s certainly was not the only probable and convincing"
By the way, Stone has put some great efforts into being the first one on the market with a movie about Kennedy.
Currently, the subjects enjoys great popularity in Hollywood, and directors and producers use any - more or less dirty - available means to be the first with their version.
Svar #3
15. november 2003 af Niels (Slettet)
Angående den der "that" regel med at man ikke må sætte komman foran skal man passe lidt på med.
Fx må man vel godt sige
Nader took General Motors to court and was awarded 270,000 dollar in damages; that is almost two million kroner.
når "that is" svarer til dvs.
Fx må man vel godt sige
Nader took General Motors to court and was awarded 270,000 dollar in damages; that is almost two million kroner.
når "that is" svarer til dvs.
Skriv et svar til: Engelsk rettelse
Du skal være logget ind, for at skrive et svar til dette spørgsmål. Klik her for at logge ind.
Har du ikke en bruger på Studieportalen.dk?
Klik her for at oprette en bruger.