Engelsk
Rettelse af et engelsk tekststykke om det britiske imperium
15. marts 2006 af
Outrageous69 (Slettet)
Hej!
Jeg ville høre om, der lige var nogle som ville hjælpe mig med at kigge dette tekststykke efter. Om der er nogle fejl? er det forståligt? mangler der noget? osv.
Det er et udsnit fra min SSO om det britiske imperium i engelsk.
På forhånd Tak for hjælpen!
According to Lenin’s theory, imperialism is a time where capitalisms free trade is substituted with its contrast, namely capitalistic monopoly. This free trade creates big industry, and with it bigger companies, which out compete smaller companies. And with it, follows a monopoly out of the free trade, because there will be a concentration of production a capital with the big companies. The monopoly is the transition to it’s highest state, capitalistic imperialism.
Financial capitalism is created from imperialism. The financial capital is a merger between bank capital and industrial capitalism. In the beginning the industry borrowed money from the bank to be able to start-up; they gradually gained a surplus which they invested in the bank. Afterwards the surplus became bigger and bigger, and therefore the capital was placed in the colonies, where they, like in the bank, could collect interest. This export of capital, is shown to be much better business then the export of goods, like Lenin said is a very prominent significance of the imperialism.
Jeg ville høre om, der lige var nogle som ville hjælpe mig med at kigge dette tekststykke efter. Om der er nogle fejl? er det forståligt? mangler der noget? osv.
Det er et udsnit fra min SSO om det britiske imperium i engelsk.
På forhånd Tak for hjælpen!
According to Lenin’s theory, imperialism is a time where capitalisms free trade is substituted with its contrast, namely capitalistic monopoly. This free trade creates big industry, and with it bigger companies, which out compete smaller companies. And with it, follows a monopoly out of the free trade, because there will be a concentration of production a capital with the big companies. The monopoly is the transition to it’s highest state, capitalistic imperialism.
Financial capitalism is created from imperialism. The financial capital is a merger between bank capital and industrial capitalism. In the beginning the industry borrowed money from the bank to be able to start-up; they gradually gained a surplus which they invested in the bank. Afterwards the surplus became bigger and bigger, and therefore the capital was placed in the colonies, where they, like in the bank, could collect interest. This export of capital, is shown to be much better business then the export of goods, like Lenin said is a very prominent significance of the imperialism.
Svar #1
15. marts 2006 af line1209 (Slettet)
Jeg mener ikke at man kan sige at imperialisme er en tid. (din første linje)skal evt bare omformuleres.
creates big industry: creates a great/large industry
and with it bigger companies: and with it larger companies.
out compete: du kan også bruge udtrykket outmatch... :-)
And with it, follows a monopoly out of the free trade: omformuler... mener du at monopoly er et resultat af free trade? (and with it, follows monopoly, as a result of free trade...)eller?
...because there will be a concentration of production a capital with the big companies...: er ikke helt sikker på hvad du mener her.
The monopoly: Monopoly (du skal ikke sætte the foran)
evt: a transition istedet for the transition.
it's: its (the??)
start up: build up?? (their buisness?)
KOMMA mellem surplus og which
KOMMA mellem business og then
then:than
punktum foran Lenin:
like Lenin said is a very prominent significanse of the imperialisme:
Like Lenin said, IT(sæt ind) is THE(sæt ind) very prominent significance of (og minus THE her) imperialisme.
hvis du er i tvivl om nogle af rettelser ne, må du endelig spørge... ved godt de er lidt forvirrende :-)
VH
Line
creates big industry: creates a great/large industry
and with it bigger companies: and with it larger companies.
out compete: du kan også bruge udtrykket outmatch... :-)
And with it, follows a monopoly out of the free trade: omformuler... mener du at monopoly er et resultat af free trade? (and with it, follows monopoly, as a result of free trade...)eller?
...because there will be a concentration of production a capital with the big companies...: er ikke helt sikker på hvad du mener her.
The monopoly: Monopoly (du skal ikke sætte the foran)
evt: a transition istedet for the transition.
it's: its (the??)
start up: build up?? (their buisness?)
KOMMA mellem surplus og which
KOMMA mellem business og then
then:than
punktum foran Lenin:
like Lenin said is a very prominent significanse of the imperialisme:
Like Lenin said, IT(sæt ind) is THE(sæt ind) very prominent significance of (og minus THE her) imperialisme.
hvis du er i tvivl om nogle af rettelser ne, må du endelig spørge... ved godt de er lidt forvirrende :-)
VH
Line
Svar #2
15. marts 2006 af Outrageous69 (Slettet)
Mange tusind tak! - det var virkelig en hjælp.
Andre der har noget?
Andre der har noget?
Skriv et svar til: Rettelse af et engelsk tekststykke om det britiske imperium
Du skal være logget ind, for at skrive et svar til dette spørgsmål. Klik her for at logge ind.
Har du ikke en bruger på Studieportalen.dk?
Klik her for at oprette en bruger.
