Engelsk
Please har behov for hjælp. passiv dansk-engelsk oversættelse!!!
de fleste af dem er passive sætninger:
Oversæt:
1. Stykket blev formodentlig skrevet af Bernhard Shaw.
2. Det blev opført på et provinsteater for første gang i 1920.
3. senere blev det omskrevet, f.eks. blev flere scener udskiftet eller forkortet.
4. disse ændringer er kommenteret af adskillige kritikere.
5. en introduktion til stykket blev skrevet af en af 30´ernes kendte dramatikere.
6. kompleksiteten i dette litterære værk kan kun forstås, når man tager ændringerne i betragtning.
7. stykket må karakteriseres som en hybrid- en mellemting mellem drama og prosa.
8. i stykket diskuteres politiske og samfundsmæssige emner.
9. temaerne kan opfattes som en kommentar til samtidens forhold, men er også relevante for nutiden.
10. fortiden skal bestemt huskes-mange grupper af unge er i dag blevet meget yderliggående.
11. mange demonstranter er f.eks. blevet dræbt.
12. ofte bliver rådgivere konsulteret.
13. bør man give disse grupper ret til mere indflydelse?
14. mindretal er blevet forfulgt til alle tider.
15. faktisk er nogle landets mindretal blevet udryddet.
16. sådanne skridt kan naturligvis ikke retfærdiggøres.
17. bedst er det, når de fjendtlige grupper bliver forsonet.
her er min engelske version:
1). The play got probably written by Bernhard Shaw
2). It got performed on a provincial theatre for the first time in 1920
3). Latere it got rewriting for example more scenes got replaced or cut
4). These changing is comment on by quite a few critics.
5). An introduction to the play got written by one of the thirties well-known dramatiste.
6). The complexity in this literary work can only understands, when you taken changing in consideration.
7). The play have to characterizes as a hybrid- a half-way house between drama and prose.
8). In the play discuss poloticals and societal subjects.
9). The themes can take in as a comment to the samtidens conditions but it is also relevant for the present.
10). The past skal certainly remember- many groups of young is today becomed much radicalized.
11). Many demonstrators is for example being killed.
12). Often gets advisers consulted.
13). Should you give these groups right to more influence?
14). Minority is becomed chosed to every times.
15). Actually some countries minority has becomed diseased.
16). These steps can of course not justifies.
17). Best it is, when the hostile groups became reconciled.
Svar #1
11. januar 2005 af burgernavn (Slettet)
2). It was performed at a provincial theatre for the first time in 1920
3). Later it was rewritten, for example more scenes got replaced or shortet down
4). These changings are commented by several critics
5). An introduction to the play was written by one of the thirties well-known dramatiste (er ikke sikker på "dramatiste")
6). The complexity in this literary work can only be understood, when you consider the changes
7)The play has to be characterized as a hybrid- a half-way house between drama and prose
skriver mere om lidt
Svar #2
11. januar 2005 af tbjorn (Slettet)
Svar #4
11. januar 2005 af Dana (Slettet)
1). The play WAS PROBABLY written by Bernhard Shaw
2). It WAS performed on a provincial theatre for the first time in 1920
3). LATER it WAS REWRITTEN for example SEVERAL scenes WAS replaced or cut
4). These CHANGES is COMMENTED on by quite a few critics.
5). An introduction to the play WAS written by one of THE WELL-KNOWN DRAMATISTS OF the thirties.
6). The complexity OF this literary work can only BE UNDERSTOOD, when you TAKE THE CHANGES INTO consideration.
7). The play have to BE CHARACTERIZED as a hybrid- SOMETHING between drama and prose.
8). In the play POLITICAL and societal subjects ARE DISCUSSED.
9). The themes can BE TAKEN as a comment to the conditions OF THAT TIME but ARE also relevant TO the present.
10). The past SHOULD certainly BE REMEMBERED - TODAY many groups of young PEOPLE HAVE BECOME VERY RADICAL.
11).FOR EXAMPLE many demonstrators HAVE BEEN killed .
12). Often advisers ARE consulted.
13). Should you give these groups THE right to more influence?
14). MINORITIES HAVE BEEN PERSECUTED AT ALL times.
15). Actually some countries' MINORITIES HAVE BEEN WIPED OUT.
16). OF COURSE SUCH steps CANNOT BE JUSTIFIED
17). IT IS BEST, when the hostile groups ARE reconciled.
Jeg er ked af at sige det, men ingen af dine sætninger var rigtige. Har du overhovedet læst i din grammatik om, hvordan man danner passiv på engelsk? Du skal også passe meget på med kongruens, det hedder kun IS, hvis der er tale om ental. Hvis du har nogen såørgsmål til rettelserne, så bare skriv, men at læse om passiv ville nok hjælpe lidt...
Held og lykke...;O)
Svar #5
11. januar 2005 af studerende19 (Slettet)
1). The play was probably written by Bernhard Shaw
2). It was performed in a provincial theatre for the first time in 1920
3). Later it was rewriting e.g severel scenes was replaced or abridged
4). These changes is comment by several critics.
5). An introduction to the play was written by a well-known dramatists of the thirties .
6). The complexity of this literary work can only be understood if you take the changes in consideration.
7). The play is characterizes as a hybrid- a half-way house between drama and prose.
8). Politically and societally subjects are discussed in the play.
9). The themes can be seen as a comment on the contemporary conditions but is also relevant for present time.
10). The past certainly has to be remembered - many groups of young ones have become much radicalized today.
11). Many demonstrators e.g. has been killed.
12). Advisers are often consulted.
13). Should you provide these groups the right to more influence?
14). Minorities have been chosed at every times.
15). Actually some of the minorities of the country have been exterminated.
16). These steps can of course not be justified.
17). It is best when the hostile groups are reconciled.
En del fejl. Har rettet de umiddelbare. Der er sikkert lidt flere, men jeg har gjort, hvad jeg kunne;)
Good luck
Svar #7
11. januar 2005 af burgernavn (Slettet)
Men Dana>> Du har også selv i hvert fald én grammatisk fejl! :-p
Svar #8
11. januar 2005 af studerende19 (Slettet)
Svar #9
11. januar 2005 af Dana (Slettet)
Svar #10
11. januar 2005 af Doven stræber (Slettet)
2). It was performed at a provincial theatre for the first time in 1920
3)Later it was rewrited, for example, serveral scenes got replaced or cut down
4)These changings is commentet by quite a few criticers
5)A introduction to the play were written by one of the thirties well-known dramatists
6)The complexity in this literary work can only understanded, when you are taking the changings in consideration
7)The play have to characterised as a hybrid- a mid-way between drama and prose.
8). In the play politicals and
?societal? subjects are discussed.
10). The past certainly has to be remembered- many groups of young has today becomed much radicalized.
11). for example many demonstrators has been killed.
12). Often advisers gets consulted.
13). Should you give these groups right to more influence?
14). Minorities has been chased in all times.
15). Actually some of the countrys minorities have becomed exterminatet.
16). Such steps can of course not be justifies.
17). Best it is, when the hostile groups becames reconciled.
Svar #11
11. januar 2005 af Dana (Slettet)
3). LATER it WAS REWRITTEN for example SEVERAL scenes WERE replaced or cut
4). These CHANGES ARE COMMENTED on by quite a few critics.
7). The play HAS to BE CHARACTERIZED as a hybrid- SOMETHING between drama and prose.
Jeg har lige fanget flere af mine egne fejl, eller fejl jeg overså i første omgang...;O)
#7 var det en af dem du havde fanget? ;O)
Skriv et svar til: Please har behov for hjælp. passiv dansk-engelsk oversættelse!!!
Du skal være logget ind, for at skrive et svar til dette spørgsmål. Klik her for at logge ind.
Har du ikke en bruger på Studieportalen.dk?
Klik her for at oprette en bruger.
