Engelsk
Engelsk stil...
20. februar 2003 af
Xabbu (Slettet)
Er der nogen der vil kigge min engelske stil igennem for fejl, så vil jeg blive meget glad.
World Trade Centre was an enormous project when it was build. It took many years, and will be the tallest and biggest construction in the USA. The architecture was quite simply and not very beautiful, but it was simple and practical. Even though most New Yorkers did not like the look of the building, it was still amazing to stand and look up in great gaze where it reached the sky.
Because of the great symbolism in World Trade Centre the Americans do not want to just let it fall. It is very important that a new “World Trade Centre” or a new building is build. Not so the people would forget the tragedy, but to show the rest of the world, and the terrorist that they cannot be taken down that easily. They do not want to show weakness and want to give the signal they have not been hit.
A new World Trade Centre will still have safety as a one of the highest priorities. They do not want such a tragedy to happen once again, so the new will be able to hold from a similar attack. They know what went wrong with the old building, so of course they wont make it again.
The drawings, which should be proposals for a new World Trade Centre, are very different. Some of them look like “the old” World Trade Centre, and the other have a very futuristic look. They are, in my opinion, too conceited. USA wants to have a status symbol, a symbol where they can show all their power, wealth and their love to their homeland.
The ideas the drawings express can be to show that USA is more developed than a lot other countries. But the new building cannot have the same architecture as “the old” World Trade Centre. It should be more modern and “futureristic”. It will still have its practical function, but know it might as well look good, and the Americans will likely love it.
As told earlier, I think the Americans want a new “World Trade Centre” to show their power. They will not be a loser, another country cannot take their power, destroy a whole building and kill a lot of people. Of course they cannot forget what happened that day but I think they want to but it behind. If the place is empty people will remember it when the pass by, so a new building will have to come. They want to look at the building, and think with sadness about what once happened here. But also with relief, that it has been rebuild. It will give a sense of safety and trust to the government.
På forhånd tak.
/Xabbu
World Trade Centre was an enormous project when it was build. It took many years, and will be the tallest and biggest construction in the USA. The architecture was quite simply and not very beautiful, but it was simple and practical. Even though most New Yorkers did not like the look of the building, it was still amazing to stand and look up in great gaze where it reached the sky.
Because of the great symbolism in World Trade Centre the Americans do not want to just let it fall. It is very important that a new “World Trade Centre” or a new building is build. Not so the people would forget the tragedy, but to show the rest of the world, and the terrorist that they cannot be taken down that easily. They do not want to show weakness and want to give the signal they have not been hit.
A new World Trade Centre will still have safety as a one of the highest priorities. They do not want such a tragedy to happen once again, so the new will be able to hold from a similar attack. They know what went wrong with the old building, so of course they wont make it again.
The drawings, which should be proposals for a new World Trade Centre, are very different. Some of them look like “the old” World Trade Centre, and the other have a very futuristic look. They are, in my opinion, too conceited. USA wants to have a status symbol, a symbol where they can show all their power, wealth and their love to their homeland.
The ideas the drawings express can be to show that USA is more developed than a lot other countries. But the new building cannot have the same architecture as “the old” World Trade Centre. It should be more modern and “futureristic”. It will still have its practical function, but know it might as well look good, and the Americans will likely love it.
As told earlier, I think the Americans want a new “World Trade Centre” to show their power. They will not be a loser, another country cannot take their power, destroy a whole building and kill a lot of people. Of course they cannot forget what happened that day but I think they want to but it behind. If the place is empty people will remember it when the pass by, so a new building will have to come. They want to look at the building, and think with sadness about what once happened here. But also with relief, that it has been rebuild. It will give a sense of safety and trust to the government.
På forhånd tak.
/Xabbu
Svar #1
21. februar 2003 af SP anonym (Slettet)
World Trade Centre was an enormous project when it was build -BUILT. It took many years, and will be (WAS) the tallest and biggest construction in the USA. The architecture was quite simply (SIMPLE) and not very beautiful, but it was simple (GENTAGELSE) and practical. Even though most New Yorkers did not like the look of the building, it was still amazing to stand and look up in great gaze where it reached the sky. (RODET SÆTNING)
Because of the great symbolism in World Trade Centre the Americans do not want to just let it fall. It is very important that a new “World Trade Centre” or a new building is build (BUILT). Not so the people would forget the tragedy, but to show the rest of the world, and the terrorist (S) that they (HVEM ER 'THEY'? DE TO TÅRNE ELLER AMERIKANERNE? PRÆCISER!) cannot be taken down that easily. They do not want to show weakness and want to give the signal they have not been hit.
A new World Trade Centre will still have safety as a (IKKE 'A' HER!) one of the highest priorities. They do not want such a tragedy to happen once again, so the new (TOWER/BUILDING) will be able to hold from a similar attack. They (THE AMERICANS- DU SKRIVER 'THEY' ALT FOR MANGE GANGE)know what went wrong with the old building, so of course they wont make it again.
The drawings, which should be (ARE)proposals for a new World Trade Centre, are very different. Some of them look like “the old” World Trade Centre, and the other (OTHERS) have a very futuristic look. They are, in my opinion, too conceited. USA wants to have a status symbol, a symbol where they can show all their power, wealth and their love to their homeland.
The ideas the drawings express can be to show that USA is more developed than a lot other countries. But the new building cannot have the same architecture as “the old” World Trade Centre. It should be more modern and “futureristic”. It will still have its practical function, but know (NOW) it might as well look good, and the Americans will (MOST)likely love it.
As told (MENTIONED) earlier, I think the Americans want a new “World Trade Centre” to show their power. They will not be a loser, another country cannot take their power, destroy a whole building and kill a lot of people. Of course they cannot forget what happened that day but I think they want to but it behind. If the place is empty people will remember it when the pass by, so a new building will have to come. They want to look at the building, and think with sadness about what once happened here. But also with relief, that it has been rebuild. (REBUILT) It will give a sense of safety and trust to the government. (MENER DU IKKE AMERIKANERNE?)
Jeg har skrevet et par rettelser med STORT inde i din stil..Håber det ka' bruges til noget..(Jeg har ikke decideret kigget på stavefejl, men har bare rettet det der lige faldt mig i øjnene......)
Hilsen
/Sméagol
Because of the great symbolism in World Trade Centre the Americans do not want to just let it fall. It is very important that a new “World Trade Centre” or a new building is build (BUILT). Not so the people would forget the tragedy, but to show the rest of the world, and the terrorist (S) that they (HVEM ER 'THEY'? DE TO TÅRNE ELLER AMERIKANERNE? PRÆCISER!) cannot be taken down that easily. They do not want to show weakness and want to give the signal they have not been hit.
A new World Trade Centre will still have safety as a (IKKE 'A' HER!) one of the highest priorities. They do not want such a tragedy to happen once again, so the new (TOWER/BUILDING) will be able to hold from a similar attack. They (THE AMERICANS- DU SKRIVER 'THEY' ALT FOR MANGE GANGE)know what went wrong with the old building, so of course they wont make it again.
The drawings, which should be (ARE)proposals for a new World Trade Centre, are very different. Some of them look like “the old” World Trade Centre, and the other (OTHERS) have a very futuristic look. They are, in my opinion, too conceited. USA wants to have a status symbol, a symbol where they can show all their power, wealth and their love to their homeland.
The ideas the drawings express can be to show that USA is more developed than a lot other countries. But the new building cannot have the same architecture as “the old” World Trade Centre. It should be more modern and “futureristic”. It will still have its practical function, but know (NOW) it might as well look good, and the Americans will (MOST)likely love it.
As told (MENTIONED) earlier, I think the Americans want a new “World Trade Centre” to show their power. They will not be a loser, another country cannot take their power, destroy a whole building and kill a lot of people. Of course they cannot forget what happened that day but I think they want to but it behind. If the place is empty people will remember it when the pass by, so a new building will have to come. They want to look at the building, and think with sadness about what once happened here. But also with relief, that it has been rebuild. (REBUILT) It will give a sense of safety and trust to the government. (MENER DU IKKE AMERIKANERNE?)
Jeg har skrevet et par rettelser med STORT inde i din stil..Håber det ka' bruges til noget..(Jeg har ikke decideret kigget på stavefejl, men har bare rettet det der lige faldt mig i øjnene......)
Hilsen
/Sméagol
Skriv et svar til: Engelsk stil...
Du skal være logget ind, for at skrive et svar til dette spørgsmål. Klik her for at logge ind.
Har du ikke en bruger på Studieportalen.dk?
Klik her for at oprette en bruger.